User talk:Random12347

RANDOM 12347

I had to create this separately today 8/03/09. As NO previous talk page existed I contacted another Wiki Editor. I have had like you, no doubt edit issues with other Users. As I did not see any USer Talk I made the assumption that you did not like any contact. Some prefer to do things that way and to be prefectly frank, I leave them to it. With regards to the Connex page I still maintian the original text, and references had been added to. I did not make the amendments owing to a family illness and not having access to my PC. As I now know you exist, then in future I where to find you. RegardsZippomk2 (talk) 04:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Wontaggi desal plant
No worries, I'm really worried about the bias in the article, there needs to be more representation of accuracies such as lack of environmental report, corruption within the government/private partnerships and the fact that it isn't required in the first place, the government could just invest in efficient water usage and sustainable water management. I'll be attacking it soon enough. Nick carson (talk) 03:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikiquette alert
As a courtesy, I am letting you know that I have filed a Wikiquette alert regarding your comments on the NBN talk page. -- Rob.au (talk) 06:32, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I read your message on neon white's talk page while checking for replies under the section above your message. There are a few of us that are experienced, sporadically or frequently working at WQA. To answer your question, it's generally not a good idea to file a WQA in response to another editor (I'm presuming the one above); it's highly likely that it would be speedy closed. If you are having issues with another editor, let your concerns be known in the same discussion - try to keep it centralised. Remember, the community may find against the user filing the WQA, in the same way that they may find against the subject of the WQA. I also suggest you try to keep it as concise as possible; overly verbose complaints often are not treated well - lots of diffs, and lots of brief explanations are best. Hope that helps, Ncmvocalist (talk) 12:55, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Random 12347 I merely state a fact all wiki editors / contributors find their work edited and at times disagree. My comment is valid and an observation of activity in Wiki each and every day! To the contrary it is constructive Regards Zippomk2 (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

About WQA
WQA is a type of informal mediation, where editors can comment on civility issues. You are welcome and encouraged to participate. Starting another alert about the editor who posted the alert about you is not recommended as it may seem in retaliation. If there are issues with the other editor they wcan be discussion in the same alert. Alot of disputes that lead to an alert turn out to involve both users being incivil towards each other. --neon white talk 04:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:57, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 06:47, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery