User talk:RandomActsofOneofAKindNess

Tone
Your text additions have generally been in a tone one wouldn't expect from an encyclopedia. Please see Manual of Style for more information...in particular, this page is worth reading. &mdash; Scientizzle 00:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Again, edits like those you made to Homeopathy are not appropriate. Please do not continue like this. &mdash; Scientizzle 01:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * While I agree to some degree with your comments at Homeopathy, they are unsourced editorializing which isn't allowed here. If you had a good source that was saying it, it might be considered for inclusion, but please propose it on the talk page first so it can be discussed and properly formatted before inclusion. -- Fyslee / talk 01:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Seriously, stop adding personal commentaries to Homeopathy. Texts like "As if using a patient's body as inviolable acreage in some bizarre turfwar to protect the client from his own century, certain homeopaths bicker with the doctor" are only justifiable if they come from a notable source, and even then only if they are relevant to explaining the subject the article. --Enric Naval (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2008 (UTC)