User talk:RandomLittleHelper

San Jose Festival
Hi RandomLittleHelper, seems there's a confusion San Jose Festival is a patronal celebration in Trujillo city, it took place in Las Delicias beach. I'm sorry for to delete the tag I did it before to read your message. Thanks for your message anyway. Best regards.--Jhonalexander (talk) 04:16, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Appaloosa
Woops, I must have accidentally hit a button. Thanks for the correction as well as the notification. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi RandomLittleHelper. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 09:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Orphaned non-free media (File:JoshuaDeets.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:JoshuaDeets.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:49, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Welcome
You were rather quick in undoing the changes I made but chose not to give a clue as tto your reasons. As it currently stands, the page on Weirtrass-Erdmann is total nonsense. The author refers to these conditions as technical tools and thereby shows that (s)he is completely ignorant of the concepts and the origin of these conditions. There are two conditions, equally important, but the article refers to oonly one of them. The one given is stated poorly and imprecisely. The expression is also poor (e.g., conditions do not "say" anything because they don't speak; conditions state or assert).

I would like you to tell me what makes you think you are qualified to judge these matters. I have and continue to work in this area and believe that my contributions are consutructive. I would not have spent time on this had I not thought that the changes were essential. You reaction to my effort is nothing unbecoming: you attempt to judge something in the area where you have no discernable expertise. This is the last contribution I have made to Wiki. If you insist on keeping nonsense on its pages, then by all means, enjoy. 22:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Please offer an explanation for your edit
Sir, I recently edited a quote on the Kerry Packer page which added the word "fucking". I provided a reliable source. The fact is that Packer did say "fucking" while making his statement. You reverted the change and had no right to do so. Wikipedia does NOT have a policy of censoring quotes because of foul language. I am going to re-insert the word "fucking" for accuracy. If you choose to revert it again, I would appreciate you offering a concise explanation as to why (not just "I didn't think it was helpful"). 22:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Sir, I am a scribe, not a vandal I am simply trying to point out links that lead to pages which are used as reference or source material yet when I click on the links and go to these pages  the material  is not  found. I wonder why you would object  to my pointing this out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.114.80 (talk) 07:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bebe Wood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The New Normal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bebe Wood


The article Bebe Wood has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable child actress; fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 11:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Bebe Wood for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bebe Wood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bebe Wood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 21:55, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Vandalism revert
Your alleged vandalism revert was nothing of the sort, please take more care in future, see here♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 21:00, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Peacekeeper award
 For your efforts to keep the peace on Wikipedia. You haven't quite got it yet, but keep up the effort. Best regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 19:01, 10 October 2014 (UTC) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Proposed deletion of Bebe Wood


The article Bebe Wood has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Tracer9999 (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)