User talk:Random Haste

Welcome!
Hello, Random Haste, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kempegowda International Airport did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 05:43, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kempegowda International Airport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 04:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kempegowda International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 14:16, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kempegowda International Airport. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 12:32, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indira Gandhi International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alliance Air. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Allahabad Airport
 * added a link pointing to Alliance Air
 * Bareilly Airport
 * added a link pointing to Alliance Air

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kempegowda International Airport. ''Mumbai is not mentioned in the schedules table and you still seem to be adamant in re-adding it. Continue reverting and I will report you to admins.'' &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 07:39, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Flights to mumbai are starting from 20/05/21 i.e. from tomorrow. Please check full schedule from tomorrow and then if you find iam wrong, then report me. Random Haste (talk) 09:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Actually flights to mumbai are operational.Flights are on Mon,Thu,Sat and Sun.Now since tomo is thursday, it is showing effective from 20/05/21. Random Haste (talk) 09:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * First, if flights are effective tomorrow, why are you claiming here, the flight is already operational? You have just contradicted your own statement. Also, these search and check type of schedules are not reliable! Show some source that explicitly displays the destination like it is for DEL from BLR. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 09:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Rajiv Gandhi international airport
Hi.....just need to clarify......india has opened its international border and most of the filghts are running as per the schedule....filghts to London,Colombo,male,Dubai,Abu Dhabi from hyderabad have started running since August 2021.....then why can't I display those destinations in the table? pls let me know the reason.......thanks Adithya003 (talk) 05:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

I even checked with the airlines website and searched for the international flights and they're available for booking Adithya003 (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello...I heard that UK and middle eastern countries have started issuing tourist visas to indian travellers and there's only one country that's still not issuing tourist visas...i.e.. USA...since anyway there's no direct flight to USA from HYD....so these destinations can be displayed in the table. Thanks Adithya003 (talk) 06:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

I've double checked these destinations in the airlines website and news sources available and have attached them as a source along with the name of the destination and I'm pretty sure that most of the destinations which I've added are resumed regular flights but not air bubble flights....yeah there may be some air bubble flights to that respective destinations.....I'll check if that's air bubble or regular flight and remove few of them which have not started regular flights yet Thanks Adithya003 (talk) 07:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

All International flights operating in and out of india is under Air bubnle arrangement, Last and final warning to you. If you continue to revert my edits on Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, I will report you to admins to block you permanently from editing. Random Haste (talk) 07:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Terminal-1.JPEG
Thanks for uploading File:Terminal-1.JPEG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 10:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Check in hall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Check in hall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Terminal 1.JPEG
Thanks for uploading File:Terminal 1.JPEG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:01, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Terminal 1.JPEG


A tag has been placed on File:Terminal 1.JPEG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/bengaluru-airport-starts-exclusive-entry-gate-flyers-only-hand-baggage-100168. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Check in hall.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Check in hall.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.indulgexpress.com/travel/2020/jun/02/travelling-via-the-kempegowda-international-airport-bengaluru-heres-a-guide-to-contactless-travel-25423.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Terminal-1.JPEG


A tag has been placed on File:Terminal-1.JPEG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://propstory.com/devanahalli-north-bangalore-real-estate/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Random Haste! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Thank you for your concern about the changes made to Chennai Airport. I have cited sources that validate that the flights are in fact operational and scheduled. I see no reason for exempting this from the general public, even if it is under the air bubble agreement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielja10 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Your edit to Kempegowda International Airport has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

hi....please refrain from removing content

hi....i have a doubt...if the airline is operating this route only till march, then why are bookings being taken till next year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:C001:D0A0:D40D:1677:992C:3690 (talk) 06:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)


 * INDIGO started Dammam route not only from hyd....but many other cities as well

Don't mark this route as never operated of you didn't heard abt this route.... you won't know about other airport's routes as you focus only on improving blr article. this isn't an air bubble....check all sources and then comment 2405:201:C001:D0A0:70CB:97EB:936E:A0FE (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kempegowda International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emirates.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kempegowda International Airport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Terminal, Metro and Revival.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Kempegowda International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 15:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Kempegowda International Airport. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  LeoFrank   Talk 15:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive Editing by Random Haste. Thank you. &mdash;  LeoFrank  Talk 17:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * , I don't care. When the most reliable soure i.e. Booking sites by airlines is considered as non-reliable, then i would presume wikipedia is full of vandalism. I did a lot of research before i added the content in the page. Now, i don't care if i am blocked or what. I wouldn't like to waste my valuable time in the place like Wikipedia. Random Haste (talk) 18:02, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Random Haste is full bag of lies. It doesnt take long to see your hypocrisies. I can quote 10 pages where you said you cant rely booking engines. Stop acting like an authority over free infromation. Wikipedia allows edits and appreciate when its done with sources. Stop being a rector of others work. High time you get blocked. Mugunthsboa (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Please add the following flights in the Airlines and destinations section of Dhaka Shahjalal International Airport
China Southern Airlines CZ 5252 Dhaka to Wuhan Myanmar Airways International 8M 621 Dhaka to Yangon Asiana Airlines OZ 7825 Dhaka to Seoul-Incheon Pegas Fly EO 6402 Dhaka to Moscow-Sheremetyevo Air Busan BX 7665 Dhaka to Seoul-Incheon Sichuan Airlines 3U 8276 Dhaka to Chongqing Kunming Airlines KY 3140 Dhaka to Kunming Iraqi Airways IA 1990 Dhaka to Baghdad 103.124.226.242 (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Changing the date MB 17:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hi ....how is the source attached along with jazeera airways a booking engine?....that's the link of flight schedule which clearly states that the HYD KWI route operates from April 2022 to Oct 2022...Request you to clearly check that.... Thanks Adithya003 (talk) 11:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)


 * jazeera airways has listed Hyderabad in its list of destinations and I attached even that source yesterday....aren't these two sources enough? Adithya003 (talk) 11:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey...i'm doing great....as you told that thai airways has terminated hyd, i was wondering when did this happen. If it really happened, it would have become a breaking news and the airline would have given an official statement regarding shutting down of operations in hyderabad right? Yes, it's true that i did not find flights for booking, but hoping they'll resume soon....Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adithya003 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chennai International Airport. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugunthsboa (talk • contribs) 13:19, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chennai International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugunthsboa (talk • contribs) 14:17, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugunthsboa (talk • contribs) 14:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * disrespectful edit comments https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chennai_International_Airport&action=history> & disruptive vandalism beyond 3 warnings). Mugunthsboa (talk) 14:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 15:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

This is out of control. You have reverted, and been reverted by many editors; you've not bothered to discuss the matter on the tal pages including Talk:Cochin_International_Airport, you threaten to report other reports but don't follow through, likely because you may know your case isn't very strong. And edit summaries like "Lack of irrelevant sources. Those are indeed booking engins only" are sloppy and unclear. You need to stop edit warring, you need to stop threatening, you need to seek the talk page--you are exhibiting the kind of OWNERSHIP that is inappropriate on a collaborative project. Drmies (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Random Haste. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. In reference to your declaration that you work part time at BLR airport, please read the policies linked in this message — DaxServer (t · m · c) 14:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello Random Haste. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Random Haste. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ''In reference to your declaration that you work part time at BLR airport and my above message, I'm wondering if your Wikipedia editing is being compensated. If so, please declare it per policy. If not, please reply to this message that you are not being paid. Thanks!'' — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, i do. But my contributions are purely source based and are not paid ones. I was adding booking engines as source and we had a little conflict, thats it. Random Haste (talk) 15:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Coimbatore International Airport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 14:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey Random Haste, the line which has been removed doesn't contribute much to the article, the line was written as BLR code is derived from the city of bangalore, does this have any context?......there is no need of saying that the code was named after it's city in the city's airport page. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adithya003 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Rajiv Gandhi International Airport
Hello Random Haste! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.indiatoday.in/cities/hyderabad/story/hyderabad-international-airport-introduces-drive-luxury-cars-1792180-2021-04-18, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Rajiv Gandhi International Airport and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Rajiv Gandhi International Airport with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Rajiv Gandhi International Airport saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Edit: Special:Diff/1018497727 — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Chennai International Airport
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chennai International Airport, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.223.251.124 (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chennai International Airport. — Preceding unsigned

Your financial interests in one airport (BLR) and hence the need to present a specific picture are pure COI. You didnt seem to have problem citing booking engine in april 2022


 * 1.cite a policy where non cited cities in airport destinations specifically are required to be removed
 * 2.Applying your own policies, why have you retained cities in BLR destination without citation?
 * 3.Go take a look at cities added at all airport destinations section.
 * 4.Cite a policy where wikipedia says booking engine sources are invalid for the purpose of destinations section in an airport article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mugunthsboa (talk • contribs) 14:15, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 06:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * In addition to the three warnings above, I also found https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kempegowda_International_Airport&diff=prev&oldid=1073923199 copied from the source. To be unblocked, you must make an appeal that answers the following questions:

Investigation opened: Contributor copyright investigations/Random Haste. MER-C 06:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * How is Wikipedia licenced?
 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?