User talk:Randomdragonpakistan

Nomination of Abeer Rizvi (model) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abeer Rizvi (model) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abeer Rizvi (model) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - The9Man  ( Talk ) 09:40, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Randomdragonpakistan, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Saqib (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Aneesa Sharif for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aneesa Sharif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aneesa Sharif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Haroon Shahid for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haroon Shahid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Haroon Shahid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 15:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, as you did at Aneesa Sharif. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
 * Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
 * State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
 * Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. —  Newslinger  talk   17:07, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ahmad Ali Butt


The article Ahmad Ali Butt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NACTOR"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Appealing my block regarding undisclosed payment allegations

 * To the reviewing administrator: I am able to provide off-wiki evidence of undisclosed paid editing via email. —  Newslinger  talk   00:09, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * To whoever has harassed because it has been done from here. Look, You want to delete this account, go ahead. Do it right now as you please. I don't care. I didn't receive any money and I will stand by it. You can block it for all I care. An Instagram account literally just harassed a friend of mine based on my username. I even have screenshots. First of all let me make it clear to you without outing myself that I'm from Pakistan which is absolutely obvious from my username. If you think I got paid for anything, why don't you go ahead and message these companies and associations directly? If you took out to the time to harass a person I know in real, why don't you target them as well. Delete this account. I'm not a content writer nor a writer at all, I'm a teacher in real life. For the person who went so far as to harass my friend just because they have the same name as mine, why don't you go into the edit history and check which city have I edited it to? It has been so far ten years. Now my name might be a surprise for people from the Punjab or Sindh region and is pretty common in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. I'm from Tank in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the person (whoever they are) harassed someone who lives in Lahore. I live in Multan. Go into the edit history and go ahead and check. It has been like that for ten years. I mean its my fault that people named John, James, Usmans have the same interests and they can't be friends? The autobiography which one person was talking about was not about me, it was about him. He asked me to make one for him and I told him it will get rejected because he is not notable enough yet and that is the reason I changed my name because the Wikipedia algorithm suspects that you are creating a page about yourself and I don't have a middle name by the way, he does. He didn't pay me because journalists get paid shit in Pakistan, alright you can literally google the Paisa Phenk movement of which that person is a supporter because he is a content writer. I'm not a content writer or writer of any sort, I'm just a teacher. You really think companies pay in Pakistan? Bro even Pepsi or Coke don't pay you, they just promote you. Learn what the exposure concept is in Pakistan for freelancers which they all complain about so stop with your high horses that I even got paid for Wikipedia because newsflash I didn't and I honestly fucking wish I did but even if I did they pay shit like all the jobs here. I'm a private person in real life, that person is not. I hardly have any social media or online presence. He loves to have an online presence everywhere because he wants to be famous that is why he asked for the Wikipedia page. I did but it got deleted and I never made it again. Fine, there you go penalize me for having a close association to the subject but penalize yourselves to for literally harassing someone who has nothing to do with the situation and even if he did, are you seriously going to go that far by cyberbullying someone. I repeat if anyone is Pakistani, tell me the condition of freelancers or content writers in Pakistan. They get paid peanuts. How much do you think I even charged for Wikipedia? Even if I was promised any payment, I was never going to receive it anyway. The only thing that person is guilty of or is being made so is just because he has the same name and oh btw why don't you take a look at the fucking fiverr account which you were talking about? I checked it too. Where the hell does it say that the person is charging for Wikipedia pages. You think even if I was, that I'm a dumbfuck to leave traces like that because I have been on Wikipedia for ten fucking years? I have tried to be nothing but civil here but if you are going to harass people, then fuck you. Delete this account right now. My friends are way more important than some stupid Wikipedia account which by the way I was just looking for to kill time and nothing else. I do not take harassment lightly so kindly restrict all this discussion to Wikipedia rather than attacking people I know in real life -User:Randomdragonpakistan


 * , can I take up your offer to email the relevant off-wiki information? JBW (talk) 22:11, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've sent you an email with the information. —  Newslinger  talk   00:14, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Randomdragonpakistan, have you ever edited using any other account or accounts? If so, please list every account you have used. JBW (talk) 22:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Autobiography
May I ask why you recently created an article about yourself? --Saqib (talk) 05:37, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Saqib, what autobiography ? Can you please tell me? --User:Randomdragonpakistan
 * Article about yourself. Don't tell me you didn't created any. --Saqib (talk) 14:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Saqib, making Wikipedia pages about yourself is highly discouraged, why would I create one? Moreover, I'm not even a notable person so a page on myself is likely to get deleted anyway then I would really like to know what exactly are you talking about? I'm a boring person with a boring life and I don't hve any contributions even if non-notable or irrelevant. I can easily admit that I made one and just go on about my day and receive whatever penalty whatever Wikipedia has on such a thing and promise not to do it again, but I really want to know what exactly are you talking about?--User:Randomdragonpakistan
 * Saqib you seem to be throwing all of these accusations around (first about the Fiverr acount (which I didn't find) and now him creating an article on himself),
 * You either need to provide diffs of the article thing or to be blunt say nothing at all,
 * Due to OUTING you obviously cannot prove the Fiverr thing however you can prove the article bit with diffs.
 * FWIW I'm not really seeing anything here that screams "paid editor" .... just someone who's creating Indian related articles? – Davey 2010 Talk 16:35, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Relax, you think an admin would block this user without any evidence? I'm not throwing around accusations. This user did created an article about himself and the admin who blocked this account can also check whether my claims are correct or not. I thought this user would admit that he did created a BLP about himself however he's still acting in bad faith. --Saqib (talk) 16:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * To be fair admins make mistakes, From an outsider pov I'm simply seeing accusations flying around but ofcourse there may be more to this than meets the eye which if there is then my apologies, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Striking as would rather not be involved. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:40, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Saqib, If I did create a page about myself I would just admit it. What possible reason would I have to lie about it? Again, I repeat it is not the end of the world. I can just move on and admit it that yes I did make a page about myself? I have more important things to do in life anyway but the reality is I didn't create a page about myself because again I repeat I'm not a notable person or any person of significance so what exactly would I write anyway about myself that would be noteworthy? Look I understand it is your job as an administrator to keep tabs and I value your contributions to Pakistan articles on Wikipedia but please understand that I'm also trying to defend myself here because what you are saying isn't true and it might be a misunderstanding. Why would I go through all the trouble of appealing my block by writing a lengthy note when I can just easily admit it or even responding here and move on? But I haven't done it. I'm only responding to all of this because I have been on Wikipedia for the past ten years that is why. Lastly, Thank you Davey 2010  but I also understand that Saqib is also doing his job as an administrator -User:Randomdragonpakistan
 * Mate, since you're not admitting that you created a BLP on yourself, I'm still against your unblock. And for what it matters, I am not an admin here. --Saqib (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe you can declare your socks, at-least or should I expect NO? --Saqib (talk) 17:40, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Saqib, You can be against my unblock if you want. I'm sure you have your reasons or there might be something you have noticed so I'm not blaming you. You are just doing your job. However, I'll do my best to fight against it to prove that I don't deserve to be blocked. I'm sorry I didn't know you weren't an admin, my mistake. I will keep on denying it as I said, if I had created it, I would just easily admit it? As I said in one of my previous messages, why would someone who has been working on Wikipedia for 10 years create a page about themselves? I mean isn't that like one of the most basic rules. It isn't that hard to admit to something you did on Wikipedia. I'm sure the administrators can easily see too. I repeat that it is best for me to admit and move on and get this sorted but I won't accept something I didn't do. -User:Randomdragonpakistan
 * As for the socks thing, yes I admit to it but that was last year. I was called out on it, I immediately apologized and I was given a warning for it and I never did it again but it was making me changes via my IP address for which I was rightfully warned. See, I admitted to it? Because it was something I did because it is better to admit to something you did do I did but I haven't created a page about myself or have received any payments. These two allegations are however false. I will go as far to say that even if you want to penalize me for that socks thing, you can even do it now. I will gladly accept the decision because at least it was something I did for which I deserved to be blocked although that thing happened once, but still if you feel its right, then, by all means, do so -User:Randomdragonpakistan
 * Look, I've evidence that you created a BLP about yourself. Lets be honest and admit it, and I've no issue with your unblock. Thanks for your patience. --Saqib (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Saqib As I already mentioned I admitted to the socks thing which is absolutely true. I don't deny that but I haven't made a page about myself. As you said, I can just easily admit it and be honest but I haven't done it. Even if I'm to be blocked, it should be at least for something I did do. At this point, I'm not even against my own block for what it matters but I'm against being blocked for something that I have not done. That is what I'm trying to tell you. Thank you for having no issues, hopefully this matter gets sorted.-User:Randomdragonpakistan

Orphaned non-free image File:Rearts.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rearts.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rearts Records logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Rearts Records logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheLittleArt.png
Thanks for uploading File:TheLittleArt.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Ganda (music producer) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ganda (music producer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 00:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rearts


Hello, Randomdragonpakistan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rearts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Little Art


Hello, Randomdragonpakistan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Little Art".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geo Cartoon


The article Geo Cartoon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2019"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  11:19, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Band Khirkyon Kay Peechay


The article Band Khirkyon Kay Peechay has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to not be notable, as nothing was found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2017"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  12:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)