User talk:Randomtime

Archives

 * /1
 * /2
 * /3

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Port 1199 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Port 1199. Since you had some involvement with the Port 1199 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 12:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dakota (British band)


The article Dakota (British band) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this band was ever at any time notable. Past versions of the article are no better. Their URL is now occupied by a weddings and functions band of the same name. WP:BEFORE shows barely even mentions of the band or their single."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 17:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)