User talk:Randomuserau54

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Moocha (talk) 14:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. petiatil &raquo;User &raquo;Contribs 14:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Revelation 22:18-19 translation
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Revelation 22:18-19 translation. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Revelation. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Revelation - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 15:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

What is going on, why cant I first just be allowed to edit in peace and when I have finished then we can talk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sindhulogy (talk • contribs) 18:33, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I think you may be misunderstanding what wikipedia is. It's an online encyclopedia where anyone can contribute, but because edits and posts can be viewed by all, it must be properly referenced, unbiased, and complete information in order to be a legitimate contribution.  Wikipedia is constantly scrutinized for it's reliability;  If pages were allowed to be posted as incomplete, and if users did not protect every page's legitimacy, Wikipedia's goal of being a reliable source would be far from reached.  Perhaps using a word document for your contributions beforehand, then copying and pasting into the edit box may help;  Linking references, separation by headings, etc. would then be the only work left.  Or, it may be most appropriate for you to create a User page that you may post about your interests, such as revelations (as long as it follows the guidelines for appropriate user pages).  Good luck.  Katherine (talk) 02:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)