User talk:Randy Johnston/Archive 2

Image Tagging Image:Printer.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Printer.png. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. -- Carnildo 06:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Image:Printer.png
I did not upload this image and have never seen it before. Were you mistaken in your message on my user page? --Randy 03:05, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, no, and maybe. The image currently displayed at Image:Printer.png is on Wikimedia Commons.  However, sometime earlier today an image with the same title was deleted from Wikipedia, which was almost certainly an image uploaded by you. --Carnildo 03:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Very sorry.
I'll honestly keep that in mind from now on. I'm sorry. Unsigned comment by User:Reanef

24.70.16.250
24.70.16.250's gone and vandalized again. Thought you should know. Thanks!:D --Dave Lohran 03:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Beer reverts
Hi - sorry, I'm not logged on at the moment. The editing I'm doing on the beer article is fine. No need to revert. No vandalism is taking place. 193.112.229.10 11:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Version 1.0 "Release Version Qualifying"
Hi, I'm interested in your feedback on Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Release Version Qualifying. It's essentially an idea to use a process similar to WP:FAC to identify and handle articles and lists that would go in a release version. Maurreen 19:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

WP 1.0
I thought since you are interested in this project you might be interested to see a CD version of en now exists see Wikipedia-CD/Download & 2006 WP CD Selection. This is being discussed on the 1.0 project pages but progress breeds enthusiasm so I thought I would let you know. --BozMo talk 09:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Community Justice
I'm afraid the current council is full. This council was unelected. Don't worry, we shall be having elections soon.

Community Justice/Elections
As Community Justice has over 30 members, we are beginning the elections process.

If you are interested in becoming the chairman, the chief executive or councillor please add yourself, and a statement, to Community Justice/Elections.

Voting shall begin on April 24th, and end on May 1st. To see if you are eligible for a vote, please see Community Justice/Elections.

Thank you,

Computerjoe 's talk 20:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

CJ election reminder
Hi Randy Johnston I noticed that you are not registered for voting or nomination in the CJ elections, and would like to remind everyone that '''all Candidates Must Submit Their Statement By April 23rd. Voting will begin April 24th, and end May 1st'''. More details on how to nominate yourself can be found HERE. I hope to see you at the elections!  • The Giant Puffin •  20:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Advocate Team Re: RfC Woggly
I am presently coordinating a team of advocates re: my RfC for harassment by user:woggly. I welcome you to be a member. Simply read the RFC lodged against me by user:woggly and the RFC which I have filed against her. It's really simple stuff when all of her harassment and my (and others) various attempts to resolve any issues are in black and white. Please also view the talks pages where Woggly admits to harassment and infers that she will not cease. Thank you for your consideration. Best wishes, IsraelBeach 19:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

No fair
Mr. Johnston,

I must say I'm a little ticked off at Wikipedia. I was posting my site on some of the pages that had to do with my site, and I kept getting messages saying to stop. That's not very fair.

Talk page header
Hi! I see you like my "status" userbox as well. Feel free to customize it to your needs (no need to stick to my exact wording). Having two templates is a bit confusing but it does mean it will work with Misza13's status-switcher script, which enhances its worth many times. (So kudos to him for writing it.) Anyway, I'm glad to see people using stuff from my userpage, as that means it must be good :). User:EdK adapted my calendar box for his page, so you're not the first – Gurch 16:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Random nonsense from User:Clydeman
You were incorrect to change to word parody to translation. The Nuestro Himno is a parody, it is not even about the Battle of For McHenry --Unsigned comment  by User:Clydeman

Adding the original National Anthem lyrics is nonsense? Nuestro Himno is a PARODY of the Star Spangled banner. Did you even bother reading the original Francis Scott Key song? When did you warn me that "Parody" is not NPOV? It is flat out NOT a translation of the Star Spangled Banner, that is why it is called "Our Anthem." In addition, why in the world would you delete "Some have called the song a parody since it does not resemble the words written by Francis Scott Key." THis is the heart of the controversy. I also checked the history and noticed that you added nothing to this topic, except undue additions that people worked on. --Unsigned comment by User:Clydeman

"Music. The practice of reworking an already established composition, especially the incorporation into the Mass of material borrowed from other works, such as motets or madrigals. " From dictionary.com Of course it is not the same song, that is why it is not a translation, but a parody. You are wrong, I did not undue anybody's work and I did not commit vandalism.

You mean adding Francis Scott Key's original version is vandalism? You tell me exactly why adding the original version is "Vandalism" and why it is a violation of Wikipedia policy.

It gives me a laugh how someone that did not contribute anything whatsoever to a certain topic can erase what people added. Read the quote from dictionary.com carefully. User:Clydeman

Jim Wales on NeutralPointOfView http://web.archive.org/web/20010416035757/http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/NeutralPointOfView

"The neutral point of view attempts to present ideas and facts in such a fashion that both supporters and opponents can agree. Of course, 100% agreement is not possible; there are ideologues in the world who will not concede to any presentation other than a forceful statement of their own point of view. We can only seek a type of writing that is agreeable to essentially rational people who may differ on particular points."

"Some examples may help to drive home the point I am trying to make." "1. An encyclopedic article should not argue that corporations are criminals, even if the author believes it to be so. It should instead present the fact that _some people_ believe it, and what their reasons are, and then as well it should present what the other side says."

VANDALISM: From wikipedia "Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia. The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of bad jokes or other nonsense."

NONSENSE: From Wikipedia: "Nonsense is an utterance or written text in what appears to be a human language or other symbolic system, that does not in fact carry any identifiable meaning."

Are you saying putting the original Francis Scott Key version fits the above? User:Clydeman

"Some argue that criticisms and commentary on certain topics are systematically excluded, deleted or reverted by self-appointed censors" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

"First of all, I don't care about some 2001 policy you've copied off archive.org."
 * It was a quote from Jimbo Wales. His views count more than an admin

"you didn't JUST add the Francis Scott Key version." You still did not explain why adding the Francis Scott Key song is "Vandalism"

The Page: "Nuestro Himno" is a Spanish translation of "The Star-Spangled Banner" It is flat out not a translation. It is a different song.

Wiki Admin?
Are you a wiki admin?User:Clydeman

Message
What did I do?

Community Justice Newsletter
 Community Justice Newsletter

Welcome to VandalProof!
Hi, thank you for your interest in VandalProof and Congratulations! You are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're ready to go!

You are also welcome to add User:Vishwin60/Userbox/VandalProof (will add a user box) or simply    to your user page.

If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Welcome to our team! - Gl e n   TC (Stollery)  05:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Signpost-textonly
Nice work. Ral315 (talk) 06:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Working on it right now via a switch statement. Default will be to show it as plaintext; other options will be available.  Ral315 (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Signpost
Thanks for your reply. I had completely forgotten about that.--  Max  Talk [ (add)] 06:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 22nd.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.