User talk:Randy Schutt

Welcome from Private Butcher
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Private Butcher 23:01, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Consensus decision-making rewrite coming soon
howdy. you're getting this message because you have made a meaningful contribution to Consensus decision-making in the last couple of months. This note is to inform you that i have done a complete rewrite of the article, basically from the ground up, and will be installing the rewrite sometime after 22:00 mst (gmt -7)

i decided to undertake this rewrite because the current article had some notable shortcomings in my opinion, most notably: all of these problems are inevitable in a project written by a group of people with different areas of expertise and writing styles.
 * lack of references: whole sections of the current article are unreferenced
 * section balance: the amount of detail on some sections was out of step with the detail level on other sections. for instance 'timing' is as large as 'key principles'
 * run-on writing: some sections succumb to rambling, while other sections are quite concise to the point of being terse.

my rewrite is designed to address these issues. most notably i have aimed to make the article more concise -- put more content in less words as it were -- and to make sure that everything is effectively sourced. i have also pretty much completely re-sectioned the article in an attempt to flow from general down to specific.

i have given this notice to you as a 'heads up' that this change is coming. i realize that you have invested a lot of effort into the existing article and i want to make sure that you are ready to make the edits you feel are necessary once my rewrite goes 'live'.

i also intend to submit the new article for peer review shortly after posting it. i think that the feedback will help us all drive this piece forward, hopefully to at least ga status! -- frymaster 23:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Open Documentary Project
Hello Randy, I am really appreciated for your contribution for wikipedia. I am a member of a professional Creative Commons documentary project, it experiments the "funding and licensing" production model. We were pleased to announce the launch of "then you win" project (http://thenyouwin.yooook.org), documentaries about non-violence movement in India. Our inspiration is from the Gandhi philosophy: "First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win."

We aim to release it with the rights to copy, modify and distribute under Creative Commons licence, we need everybody’s help to achieve that goal. As I can see you are a honour contributor for wikipedia, so we believe that you might interested in our project. Please have a look our website and trailer and let me know if you could help us. Please feel free to contact me anytime if you have any questions. My email is aey@garbure.org. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nijiko (talk • contribs) 21:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Talkback
I've finished a rough script per your request; try it and let me know how it works. :) Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 17:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I forgot that you might not know how to install user scripts; I've left instructions at the VPT thread. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 18:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Documentation page?
Hi, Randy, it's not that big a deal, but please don't write documentation for the scripts in my userspace, especially without telling me. I'm not a fan of that. Thanks. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 04:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Writ Keeper. I'm sorry, I was trying to be helpful, but after I wrote that documentation and posted it, I realized that it was your space and I was probably intruding. I'm still new to this environment and haven't learned the etiquette of how to do these things properly. I guess I should have written a note in your user space to let you know or sent an email. Or now I realize I should have just sent you an email with my suggestion. Again, I am very sorry. Randy Schutt (talk) 10:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Like I said, don't worry about it; it's not a big deal. :) Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 14:11, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Ideological Leanings of the Supreme Court of the United States, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Make cat  05:40, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Randy, I would like to talk to you about judicial ideologies. Might you email me at NLG64 at mindspring dot com? Thanks --Ngeorgak (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Law clerks, again.
Hi Randy, can you have a quick look at Talk:List_of_law_clerks_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States and thereafter User:The_Original_Filfi/sandbox as this is your work and I can see it was quite involved, I do not want to proceed without at least some agreement Kind regards The Original Filfi (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi again Randy, as you can tell I give up easily and have trouble following things through, lol I have, I think the best solution so far, will it pass the test? not sure, but here I go.

Your thoughts, this (reformatted to include court no, justice etc.) should meet all requirements, unless I have missed something, if so please advise and we can try to address. Kind regards The Original Filfi (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Please review User:The_Original_Filfi/sandbox for some dummy data, in the wrong format, this can be addressed going forward, and then;
 * 2) Please review User:The_Original_Filfi/sandbox2 for the same dummy data, also in the wrong format, this can be addressed going forward, and then;
 * 3) Please review User:The_Original_Filfi/sandbox3 for transclusions of above, also in the wrong format as this was carried from above.
 * Hi Randy, not sure you will get notified, so a note here to let you know, I answered your post on my talk page, for your review, regards.The Original Filfi (talk) 12:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Largest legit edit ever!
Congratulations, sir! You have made the largest non-vandalism edit on the English Wikipedia!

[+773,881 bytes to List of law clerks of the Supreme Court of the United States]

EnigmaLord515 (talk) 16:29, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Number of U.S. Supreme Court Cases Decided by Year has been accepted
 Number of U.S. Supreme Court Cases Decided by Year, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Number_of_U.S._Supreme_Court_Cases_Decided_by_Year help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Slywriter (talk) 20:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)