User talk:Raneemh

Welcome!
Hello, Raneemh, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Raneemh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Raneemh


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Raneemh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:12, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Raneem, Im Nableezy and Ive been here a while and Id like to try to help you make the most of your time editing here. There are a few things about Wikipedia and how it is run that you have to be aware of so as to avoid unproductive arguments and potentially administrative sanctions. The first of which is we operate on consensus. And Ill get back to what "consensus" means here on Wikipedia in a bit. But there are lots of people with lots of opinions here, so we try to set that aside and evaluate as dispassionately as we can what the body of reliable sources say about a topic. And then we try to work out how create a "neutral point of view" description of that topic. But neutral doesnt mean we decide who is right and who is wrong and tell a story from one perspective, rather it means trying to describe the views that exist without engaging in the debate about them. For example, a topic I was pretty heavily involved in some years ago, the articles on the various Israeli settlements have a line saying "the international community considers Israeli settlements illegal under international law, however Israel disputes this". Now being honest with you, I think thats a cop out, the settlements are blatantly illegal, and nearly every serious source on the planet agrees. But we describe the dispute, most of the world says X, but Israel says Y. So, back to consensus. Consensus here isnt a vote, or at least it isnt just a vote, its a vote weighted based on what arguments are the most policy compliant. There been discussions I was on the losing side by the numbers, but my argument was more in keeping with our policies so the "consensus" went that way (for example, Talk:Jerusalem Day). Most of the times things will go by the numbers here, but not necessarily. But in the discussion at Palestinian genocide accusation, there was near uniform acceptance of that title as the least bad option at least. And a recognition that something like Palestinian genocide would never garner that widespread support. But thats how it goes on an international project that welcomes all perspectives, youre going to have to accept that sometimes you have to find what everybody hates least and accept that. I would really like you to find this to be a welcoming place, and I think youll find it that way if you are able to understand how things work here. If there is anything I can help you with please free to write on my user talk page, linked in my signature at the end of this message. Take care,  nableezy  - 04:01, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There are a few more things you have to understand about our articles and their talk pages. They are based on other sources, not our own arguments. We cant say this meets such and such definition and as such this and this are true. That is original research. We need reliable sources to support viewpoints directly for them to be included. And when there is a conflict in reliable sources, we have to then reflect that disagreement. If there are enough reliable sources that dispute that, for example, the attacks in Gaza meet the definition of genocide then the Wikipedia article cannot say as a statement of fact that they do. Next, for talk pages, they are meant not for discussing the real world conflict, but rather for discussing the sources and what they say and how our article should reflect them. So arguing that something is true is not going to be a productive use of your time. Because what matters for our articles is not what we know, it is what we can source.  nableezy  - 04:10, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! I wasn't aware. I appreciate the education. Raneemh (talk) 04:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I would start with reading WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:OR, along with WP:RS to get a solid basis for how we are supposed to construct an article, and along with that how to argue according to the content policies on our talk pages. Its a lot of reading, but this is an encyclopedia after all. And again, feel free to ask me any questions.  nableezy  - 04:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Canvassing
I see you made a pinned post on your twitter/X account (which is easily findable from the link on your userpage) advocating for other people to join the discussion on the Palestinian genocide talkpage, saying that you would like it if people requested a change enmasse to the title of the article and don't want Wikipedia regulars to control the narrative. This is a violation of Wikipedia policy on canvassing (located at Canvassing), specifically Canvassing and Canvassing. Hemiauchenia (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Alright. Thank you for notifying me. I have stated my intent to close the discussion. Raneemh (talk) 04:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, what we want here is everything above board. There are lots of examples of canvassing on either side of these hot topic issues, and they are all wrong in that they are attempting to subvert our consensus model. Argue with the best sources to the best of your ability, but do it within the rules we have and things will be much easier here.  nableezy  - 04:44, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

User page
Past versions of your user page are still in the history, you can ask that it be deleted by placing on your user page.  nableezy  - 18:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not sure I did it correctly. Raneemh (talk) 06:57, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Senate Avenue YMCA
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Raneemh. Thank you for your work on Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nancy Woloch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wesley College. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:57, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * dpl bot i know you always got my back Raneemh (talk) 17:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Page move
Hi. Thank you for creating the page Vaughn v. Williams. During the new page curation process, I moved this article to the title "Rhodes family incident" for two reasons. (1) The content of the article outlined the history of the incident, rather than the case and trial, and (2) it appears that the title is better fitting per WP:COMMONNAME. If you disagree with or object to this move, send me a ping and I will move it back, and will open a discussion on the talk page. Keep in mind that as part of this move, the original title will automatically redirect to the new title, so searches for "Vaughn v. Williams" will redirect accordingly. Thank you for this article, and happy editing! Bgv. (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2024 (UTC)