User talk:Ranger2006

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 01:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

License tagging for Image:Gen Sir R L McCreery.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gen Sir R L McCreery.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Courtesy messages
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. (Requestion 00:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC))


 * The 3 external links you added to the celiagreen.com website are a slight improvement but I'm curious. Why are you adding so many celiagreen.com external links? Is this your website? (Requestion 21:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC))

blatantly86.139.76.130 01:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Anastrophe 15:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Celia Green.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Celia Green.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 17:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for this message. Please note, there is currently no image of Celia Green in the public domain, and she has given her permission for the use of the photograph in question on Wikipedia. Ranger2006 (talk) 12:53, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Celia Green.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Celia Green.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Negative priming
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Negative priming, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Negative Priming. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Hallucinations in those who are not mentally ill has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Hallucinations in the sane constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 14:24, 21 May 2008 (UTC))

Hallucinations in the sane move
You'll need to discuss this on the article talk page to establish a consensus on what the article should be called. Perhaps leave a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology to ask for more opinions. Epbr123 (talk) 15:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

double article

 * have asked for some help Administrators%27_noticeboard Earlypsychosis (talk) 23:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Celia Green for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celia Green, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Celia Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Beccaynr (talk) 15:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Celia Green, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 15:32, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * My revision and updates were intended to be constructive. The recent additions and deletions made to the article have changed its tenor from Green being a psychologist and philosopher, for which she is best known, to being a parapsychologist. Lucid dreaming and out-of-body experiences, the phenomena with which Green is most associated, are psychological not parapsychological topics. Ranger2006 (talk) 14:23, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It is policy that All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. It therefore does not appear constructive to remove reliable sources from the article that broadly support recognizing Green's work as focusing on parapsychology. Beccaynr (talk) 14:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)