User talk:Rangeview

Welcome!

Hello, Rangeview, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to do not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! ·:· Will Beback ·:· 06:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

{unblock-ip|1=219.101.41.247|2= Edit warring |3=Gogo Dodo}


 * You appear to be blocked directly; please explain why you feel you should be unblocked (WP:GAB may be a helpful read). – Luna Santin  (talk) 07:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Discussion of editions to entries "impulsive", "careless", and "redneck". This is probably the appropriate forum to discuss any posts on the foregoing entries rather than engaging in edit warring. Thank you.

Notice of Arbcom sanctions
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles.

Your edit here seems to be an example of POV-pushing, since it makes no reference to any grounds based in Wikipedia policy. Our job is to create a neutral article that reflects the facts as they are reported by reliable sources. If you have concerns about the current wording of the article, I recommend that you explain your reasoning on the article's talk page. So far, you have posted nothing on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hi. Just a few things to remember. The Israel-Arab topic area is subject to new rules. Please keep your reverts in this topic area limited to one in a 24 hour period. Second, I voiced my support for your recent edit in the 2006 Lebanon war on that article's Talk page Third, I suggest you make use of the Talk page rather than relying exclusively on edit summaries to explain your edits. Please accept this friendly advice and happy editing.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at 2006 Lebanon War. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:52, 16 November 2010 (UTC) During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Rangeview for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Blocked Again
I've reset your block to two weeks for creating another account to avoid the block here. TN X Man 18:42, 16 November 2010 (UTC)