User talk:Ranieldule

Hoax Section on the Conflict Page
Please do not edit without discussing it first, especially since your claim is false. The hoax section uses sources from Haaretz as well as ynetnews. Yossiea 15:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * You ignored 20+ discussion posts on the subject, created a another heading for the same discussion and edited. Please do not edit without reviewing discussion first and the valid points made in those discussions. Ranieldule 15:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Care to comment?
There is a discussion on Roles of non-combatant State and non-State actors in the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict talkpage about the inclusion of detail for Israel. I am of the view that Israel should be included but the detail is being continually removed by User:Tewfik.

Tewfik's argument is what he considers the illegality of Hezbollah under UN 1559. How this has a bearing on a balanced representation of aid to the combatants is never made clear. Tewfik has not removed recent requests of arms sales to Israel such as jet fuel and GBU-28's but removed the history of such arms shipments. I believe he is pushing the POV that aid to Israel is only in response to the current crisis or the illegality of Hezbollah under 1559. US aid to Israel is in fact a long standing agreement responsible for the size and makeup of the IDF. Without the aid they would not have a military capable of engaging in conflict. This is a question of balance in the article and if you can take a look and support my position (was working under 82.29.227.171) that would be great. RandomGalen 17:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)