User talk:Ranjanravie

Hello from Bob Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, you can ask me on my talk page, check out Questions, or place helpme on this page and ask your question here.

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Yadav. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 4twenty42o (talk) 00:13, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yadav, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 13:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Yadav, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 13:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I've removed your addition at Yadav, as we've discussed the Chandravanshi/Kshatriya/Krishna issue for months at Talk:Yadav, so now is not the time to drop in and add material with no footnote whatsoever. Please see our lengthy discussions on these issues at the Talk page and its archives. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2011 (UTC)


 * And I have just done the same again, for fundamentally the same reasons as above. Your actions are bordering on being WP:Edit warring - please be careful otherwise this could lead to you being blocked from editing. You are welcome to demonstrate some sources for your statements at Talk:Yadav but you should not remove the existing information without discussion, which has indeed taken place only recently. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Yadav, you may be blocked from editing. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
So far, almost every edit you have made has been to try to change the content of Yadav to one which is against consensus and is not neutral. If you do so again, you will be reported for edit warring and your account may be blocked. You must discuss the issue on the article's talk page; however, I recommend first reading the talk page and archives, because this issue has been extensively discussed, so you don't want to just repeat what others have said. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Ranjanravie. Why don't you try to discuss your changes on the talk page. The material which you want to remove may be against various wiki policies like WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:DUE, etc. Please study these policies and bring your concerns on the talk page and try to make your case there. What you are doing may be right. aBut you need to do it in the proper way too. M W ℳ 13:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 Hours for Edit Warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 19:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Continued edit warring
I am not sure why it is that you are persisting in edit warring by removing valid, cited content at Yadav. If you continue in this vein then it is quite likely that your next block will be for a longer period. If you have an issue with the content then please discuss it at Talk:Yadav. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

the article YADAV needs correction
the article YADAV needs correction. The YADAV community is being stripped of its history and all wrong information is put in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sutradhari2000 (talk • contribs) 16:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Please provide references and discuss why you think the information is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sutradhari2000 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Yadav, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 17:56, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Yadav. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 19:16, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Yadav
Please stop your disruption of the article Yadav. All content added to Wikipedia must be supported by reliable sources (see WP:RS to learn about that), and must adhere to a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV). And if you have any commentary you wish to air, you should do it on the Talk page and not in the article itself - but be very careful before you make accusations of improper behaviour against others, as that can have a tendency to backfire.

If you add any material and it gets reverted, do not engage in edit-warring to put it back. Instead, discuss it on the article's Talk page, present reliable sources to support your case, and try to achieve consensus - if a consensus agrees that your material can be added, then you can make it so.

I see you have already had one block for edit-warring - if you carry on with your apparent battlefield approach, there will very likely be another in your near future. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:45, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Yadav, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Please note that just because you were away from Wikipedia for 2 years does not change that you've returned to immediately engage in the same inappropriate behavior. Even one more disruptive edit and this account will be reblocked; this time it will be indefinite, since it seems that your underlying attitude remains problematic. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)