User talk:Rank99

Nomination of Jason Donoghue for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Donoghue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jason Donoghue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dloh cierekim  00:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Vaughan
Hello, Rank99. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Matthew Vaughan, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Matthew Vaughan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matthew Vaughan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Matthew Vaughan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

2010 general election (2010) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2010 general election (2010). Since you had some involvement with the 2010 general election (2010) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 10:39, 19 July 2017 (UTC)