User talk:RankTheSmoke

October 2022
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 19:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I expanded on and added clarification to the "Interior waterproofing" sub heading. I then added citation. The only link I added was to the damp proofing page of Wikipedia. If you disagree with the citation, remove that, not the actual information that will benefit users. RankTheSmoke (talk) 19:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * We can't use vendor websites are sources. Please have a look at WP:RS to learn about Wikipedia's citation requirements. I cannot remove only the citation, that would leave unsourced content behind. MrOllie (talk) 19:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * My point still stands, you should have just removed the citation and left the improved information.
 * I would also argue that no one is going to understand and have better information on this specific subject(and subjects like it) more than the contractors that work in the industry in which their company websites are the best source of information. Which is why I and many others would consider it to be a reliable source. RankTheSmoke (talk) 19:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, the original content was unsourced and had no citation. RankTheSmoke (talk) 19:29, 28 October 2022 (UTC)