User talk:Rankin15

Welcome!
Hello, Rankin15, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Grizzly (Nuclear Software), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Home Lander (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Grizzly (Nuclear Software)


A tag has been placed on Draft:Grizzly (Nuclear Software), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://moose.inl.gov/grizzly/SitePages/Team.aspx. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Home Lander (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MAMMOTH (Nuclear Software) (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:MAMMOTH (Nuclear Software) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Rankin15 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Rankin15 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I reverted the declination due to copyright grounds, but many issues remain. S Philbrick (Talk)  21:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:BISON (Nuclear Software)


A tag has been placed on Draft:BISON (Nuclear Software), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://bison.inl.gov/SitePages/Team%20Members.aspx?researcharea=*&organization=BISON. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Home Lander (talk) 20:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , I removed the CSD template. I don't believe it qualifies is G 12 because I believe it is a work of the federal government and thus public domain although the article did not comply with our attribution requirements as required and as noted in a subsequent post.
 * My rationale obviously does not address the G 11, but given that the editor is being paid to create this article and has disclosed, I think it's worth waiting to see if the issues can be resolved. S Philbrick  (Talk)  20:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * My rationale obviously does not address the G 11, but given that the editor is being paid to create this article and has disclosed, I think it's worth waiting to see if the issues can be resolved. S Philbrick  (Talk)  20:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Issues
The draft you are working on: Draft:BISON (Nuclear Software)

Came to my attention because it triggered a potential copyright concern. I believe that because it's a work product of the federal government, it is not technically a copyright violation, but it does have a number of problems.

Technically, I could remove it because it doesn't comply with our attribution requirements, but given that it's in draft space, I'll let that go and encourage you to do some homework.

At a minimum, you need templates to acknowledge that this is not your work and is public domain. I urge you to look here: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Help:Public_domain

also note that there are multiple problems with the formatting, including the referencing.

See: Manual of Style

and Help:Referencing_for_beginners

You might also check in at the teahouse for general advice. Teahouse/Questions S Philbrick (Talk)  20:50, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * See WP:PD where they have an example of Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The Idaho National Laboratory would be very similar to this case. Even if it is by US.gov, it should not be a copy-paste of their website pages.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:57, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , I agree that it should not simply be a copy paste, which is why I dropped some comments in expressing my concerns about the content. However, I don't think we should remove it on the basis of copyright violations. S Philbrick  (Talk)  21:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * I'll follow up on my point above and direct it to Rankin15. While I have pushed back on the removal of the material due to copyright concerns, that doesn't mean that everything is fine. Many new editors under-appreciate that Wikipedia has a "house style" and material written for other purposes and other audiences may not be appropriate as is in a Wikipedia article. Part of this is technical — we have a style for references, we have rules regarding what should be in bold and not bold, etc. The copied material doesn't remotely comply. There are also some embedded links which are a violation of our manual of style. The list of team members follows a nonstandard style. Plus, I haven't even addressed whether this meets our notability standards. S Philbrick (Talk)  21:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * So if it refers word-by-word to Idaho National Laboratory website material, or potentially its research, how is that different from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory case presented on the WP:PD article where it says: "The Oak Ridge National Laboratory, for instance, is operated by a contractor for the US Department of Energy, but that does not mean the works it produces are "works of the federal government". ORNL works are copyrighted, and the US government is granted a non-exclusive license to use, publish, and allow republication of such works. The precise terms vary from one lab to the next, but in general, commercial re-use of their works is prohibited" Looking at the ORNL website and the INL website, they are formatted in a similar manner, referring to US Dept. of Energy in the footer.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 22:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , Excellent point, AngusWOOF. I confess I saw the DOE icon and wanted to make sure we weren't overreacting. after looking closer I see (Emphasis added). It is saying they are operating it for the DOE not that they are the DOE. Despite spending a lot of time copyright issues, I had not fully read Public_domain prior to today — I agree that the Oak Ridge example is very much on point. that may have been something nagging me in the back of my mind, because I use the phrasing "I believe it is a work of the federal government", rather than the more definitive "it is a work of the federal government".
 * It may well be a copyright violation.
 * I realize it is only been a day but I'm disappointed that the editor has not weighed in. Would you be averse to placing this issue on hold for a day or two while we wait to hear from the editor? As I and others have noted, there are significant issues other than the potential copyright violation, and it will be more difficult to discuss these with a good-faith editor if they are gone. I do recognize that we want to act swiftly in the case of copyright violations, so if you think we should not wait I would be hard-pressed to argue. the site doesn't explicitly state copyright — while I am very aware that copyright is automatic and doesn't need to be stated, I think it's worth asking the question whether the editor can check out the copyright status because there's at least a chance that this is viewed as public domain due to their relationship with the Department of Energy. I'll reiterate that that would not make everything okay, but it may be worth waiting a day or two to hear the answer. S Philbrick  (Talk)  14:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , sure, I wouldn't mind if it were written and referenced properly so it isn't in the same verbiage as presented on the website, and would give some leeway to close paraphrasing if the website statements aren't copyrighted. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 02:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , sure, I wouldn't mind if it were written and referenced properly so it isn't in the same verbiage as presented on the website, and would give some leeway to close paraphrasing if the website statements aren't copyrighted. AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 02:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RELAP-7 (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RELAP-7 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:RELAP-7, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:RELAP-7 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girth_Summit&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:RELAP-7 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Girth Summit  (blether) 23:14, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rattlesnake Nuclear Energy Software (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rattlesnake Nuclear Energy Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rattlesnake Nuclear Energy Software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rattlesnake_Nuclear_Energy_Software Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girth_Summit&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rattlesnake_Nuclear_Energy_Software reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Girth Summit  (blether) 23:16, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marmot Nuclear Energy Software (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marmot Nuclear Energy Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marmot Nuclear Energy Software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Marmot_Nuclear_Energy_Software Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girth_Summit&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Marmot_Nuclear_Energy_Software reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Girth Summit  (blether) 23:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MAMMOTH Nuclear Energy Software (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:MAMMOTH Nuclear Energy Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:MAMMOTH Nuclear Energy Software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:MAMMOTH_Nuclear_Energy_Software Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girth_Summit&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:MAMMOTH_Nuclear_Energy_Software reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Girth Summit  (blether) 23:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grizzly Nuclear Energy Software (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grizzly Nuclear Energy Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Grizzly Nuclear Energy Software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Grizzly_Nuclear_Energy_Software Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girth_Summit&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Grizzly_Nuclear_Energy_Software reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Girth Summit  (blether) 23:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BISON Nuclear Energy Software (January 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Girth Summit was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BISON Nuclear Energy Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BISON Nuclear Energy Software, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BISON_Nuclear_Energy_Software Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Girth_Summit&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BISON_Nuclear_Energy_Software reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Girth Summit  (blether) 23:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Stop
Hi, I'm Girth Summit, an administrator and new article reviewer here. I've just declined a whole bunch of your drafts - please stop creating drafts that consist of external links, or which contain copyright violations. Read the links you have been given above. Read WP:FIRST. Read WP:COPYVIO, WP:NCORP, and WP:NOTPROMO. Please read these before making any more drafts. Thanks Girth Summit  (blether)  23:31, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi - just a note to expand on the comments above. I had overlooked the comments that User:Sphilbrick made - if the content is indeed in the public domain then, with appropriate attribution, would could potentially host it in draft space without any problems. If you would like me to restore the deleted drafts I will be happy to do so. The other concerns still stand though - the text as you had it is not appropriate for an article in Wikipedia. You would need reliable independent sources supporting the content (so not your own website, but material written by people unrelated to your organisation), and it would need to be phrased in a more neutral manner - phrases such as 'For licensing information please contact...' are inappropriately promotional for an encyclopedic article. Let me know if you want me to restore the drafts for you to work on. Thanks Girth Summit  (blether)  08:47, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:MAMMOTH (Nuclear Software)


The page Draft:MAMMOTH (Nuclear Software) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://moose.inl.gov/mammoth/SitePages/Home.aspx. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review  Girth Summit  (blether)  23:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:BISON (Nuclear Software)


The page Draft:BISON (Nuclear Software) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://bison.inl.gov/SitePages/Team%20Members.aspx?researcharea=*&organization=BISON. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review  Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)  23:42, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: MAMMOTH (Nuclear Software) (January 26)
<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:MAMMOTH_(Nuclear_Software) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CatcherStorm was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

 CatcherStorm    talk   05:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rattlesnake Nuclear Energy Software


Hello, Rankin15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rattlesnake Nuclear Energy Software".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:19, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:RELAP-7


Hello, Rankin15. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "RELAP-7".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Μεταφερθείσα (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2020 (UTC)