User talk:Raoulmachal

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:20, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring and WP:BLP violations at Q Society of Australia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm Bahudhara. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Battle of Broken Hill seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bahudhara (talk) 03:44, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * And more. There is no consensus on the article's Talk page for use of the word "terrorism", and no source that describes it as such. You are applying original research, which is unacceptable. Please don't change it again. People are watching and this can only lead to negative results for you. HiLo48 (talk) 03:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * You should not have changed the article again without discussion. Your are displaying unacceptable obsession here. HiLo48 (talk) 03:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for an indefinite period
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for this edit where you explicitly threatened another editor with some kind of serious retribution. I note also edits such as this and this where you took an entirely unhelpful approach to other editors, as well as this post where you abused another editor and this post which could also be reasonably interpreted as a threat. Leaving aside Wikipedia's zero-tolerance attitude to legal and other threats, the attitude demonstrated by these posts strongly indicates that you are not here to work with other editors to cooperatively build an encyclopaedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 08:10, 28 September 2014 (UTC)