User talk:Raphael1256

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Date (January 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Heliosxeros was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucky Date and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucky Date, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lucky_Date Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Heliosxeros&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Lucky_Date reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EROS message 15:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Lucky Date
Wikipedia is guided by a set of rules. Firstly, articles have to be sourced with references which is not the case for your submission. Moreover, your article doesn't establish notability. It would be of improvement if his career as a producer/DJ is further elaborated in terms of the events occurred in his career eg. career activities, album release, tours and etc. EROS message 13:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kill The Buzz
Hello Raphael1256,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kill The Buzz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Slatersteven (talk) 16:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom & Jame


A tag has been placed on Tom & Jame requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:08, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Kill The Buzz
Hello, Raphael1256,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Kill The Buzz should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Kill The Buzz.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 07:54, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kill The Buzz


The article Kill The Buzz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Iffy★Chat -- 09:58, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Gauvain Sers (singer) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Gauvain Sers (singer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  16:56, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom & Jame for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom & Jame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom & Jame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Zinedine Zidane
His name is Zinedine Zidane not Zinédine Zidane. Please see Talk:Zinedine Zidane for evidence. Matthew_hk  t  c  07:39, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Kill the Buzz (DJ)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Kill the Buzz (DJ). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:Kill The Buzz (DJ). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:Kill The Buzz (DJ). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks
Many thanks for you thanking me on creating the page for Martin Garrix. He is a talented artist indeed and it was my pleasure. As a token of appreciation, since I saw your work on Gauvain Sers had been moved to draft, I edited somewhat the page to make things easier for your entry to be accepted. Surely him making it to number 1 in France and making it further to the Belgian Wallonia chart and the Swiss Hitparade chart will help in making him notable enough. See Draft:Gauvain Sers (singer). I may further improve on the page as well Again many thanks. werldwayd (talk) 19:30, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Michel Granger, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 153.229.106.187 (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Boby Lapointe. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 153.206.144.151 (talk) 00:20, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Christophe Maé. 153.202.194.148 (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

Please protected article from vandalizing edition
Good afternoon Raphael1256, can you please protect this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amatuni from vandalizing edition of user:Seraphim system. Thank you.

User:Seraphim system removed credible information with references and citations.НазариНазар (talk) 18:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kill The Buzz (DJ)


Hello, Raphael1256. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kill The Buzz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gauvain Sers (singer)


Hello, Raphael1256. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gauvain Sers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kill the Buzz


Hello, Raphael1256. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kill the Buzz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Jalen Folf  (talk)  18:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without references are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

About adding English pronunciations
Hi, I realised you've been adding English pronunciations for French names. Can you please use instead of ? All you have to do is split the phonemes up such as this: Also, I'm not too sure whether some names have a defined English pronunciation - perhaps you should consult on a pronunciation dictionary or broadcasting video for a pronunciation and then cite it. Sorry if I seem a little up your sleeve, seems to be the preferred option. — oi yeah nah mate amazingJUSSO ... [ɡəˈdæɪ̯]! 13:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Raekwon, you may be blocked from editing.  Rob van  vee  11:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
 * As per my edit summary: Discogs is unreliable and fails WP:USERG. Please see WP:ALBUMAVOID.  Rob van  vee  14:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kill the Buzz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kill the Buzz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kill the Buzz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Slatersteven (talk) 13:57, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Do you have a wp:coi with this artist?Slatersteven (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Kill the Buzz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 19:13, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Kill the Buzz. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  16:07, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

This now appears have been twice you have done something like this.Slatersteven (talk) 16:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Kaaze, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Please see MOS:CAPS. Thank you.'' Jalen Folf   (talk)  19:01, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Late notice about artist to record label redirects
Please stop test blanking artist to record label redirects. These edits are rather pointless and clog up the Recent changes. Jalen Folf  (talk)  04:08, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Pau, Nouvelle-Aquitaine. Ridiculous.
Nouvelle-Aquitaine has been invented 5 years ago. Pyrénées-Atlantiques was not much better, created in 1969 (Basses-Pyrénées renamed). A more intelligent choice would have been Béarn. This did not change since 1000 years and counting. --— J. F. B. (me´n parlar) 18:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kaaze


Hello, Raphael1256. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaaze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Saint-Clément-des-Baleines, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. '' It appears you may not have sufficient mastery of English to be editing here. Please be more careful with your edits.'' Eric talk 14:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Saint-Clément-des-Baleines. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges.   Eric talk 16:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

IPA
Hello! I’ve see you’ve been adding various IPA transcriptions. Just one note: when you do, please make sure they follow the help pages they are linked to (see my recent edit at Dordogne for an example, the IPA links to Help:IPA/Occitan). I suggest you go back and review your additions.

Let me know if you have any doubts. Regards, 〜 イヴァンスクルージ九十八 ［IvanScrooge98］ （ 会話 ） 10:34, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric talk 18:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lusignan, Vienne. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop changing the case of article titles in links, and please stop changing French placenames to direct English translations of them. Eric talk 18:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

June 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Claude Makélélé, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:57, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Fabio Vacchi. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 07:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Clara Morgane. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Yukon
Bonjour et merci, was just curious, does Canadian French not use /y/? ~Sıgehelmus♗(Tøk) 08:10, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Custom signature fix needed
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default: Solution 2: Fix your custom signature: Solution 3: Do nothing:
 * 1) Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * 2) Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * 3) Remove anything in the  text box.
 * 4) Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.  (Do not click the red "" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * 1) Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * 2) Click the  button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
 * 3) Update your signature to fix the error.
 * 4) Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
 * 1) In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)