User talk:Rapidoman

Welcome

 * }

Repost of Paul R Spiring
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead recreating the page. Thank you. --Lambiam 12:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Paul R Spiring. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Crusio (talk) 12:53, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Paul Spiring
Hi and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, there was a discussion (Articles for deletion/Paul Spiring) 2 weeks ago about this article, and it was decided it should be deleted. You can contest this deletion at Requests for undeletion. Unfortunately, we do not allow re-post of deleted articles before a consensus emerges. Thank you for your understanding. -- Luk  talk 12:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay - thanks. Sorry, I wasn't aware of this. Seems a little odd to me. Rapidoman (talk) 13:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)]]