User talk:RapperMan12

This page should not be deleted because 4Dbling is adored by thousands of kids. Although he has not yet reached the billboard top 100 he is very popular and has created a new kind of music that is appreciated by both the young and older generations.

Notability of 4dbling
A tag has been placed on 4dbling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste: talk 15:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Resources for 4Dbling credibility
Based upon your comments, I do not believe that you have any reliable sources at this time. Information from the artist's webpage and is either self-published by a person with reason to inflate his importance or else subject to automated manipulation (creating a program to repeatedly request a download is a simple programming task). The closest thing to a reliable source that you mentioned was interview in Highwire Daze. A search for information on this magazine however finds it is not listed in the OCLC and thus does not appear to be available in any libraries or similar archives. Furthermore most information on the web about the publication is located at free webhosting locations such Tripod.com and MySpace. The magazine also does not have have any information available on how to subscribe on these webpages, but instead has a place asking for donations on its MySpace page. As for your private data collected from the musicians and their managers, that is categorized as original research under Wikipedia policy. --Allen3 talk 17:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)