User talk:Rapture2018

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia. You have now added the same text three times to the article Rapture, each time without an edit comment and despite its being reverted by two different editors with explanations as to why.

There is a field on the edit page for adding a brief explanation of each edit. It helps others to evaluate your change if you fill this in each time. You can see all previous changes to the article and their comments by following the History link (or tab) in the article header.

Text in Wikipedia articles evolves as a result of achieved Consensus. If editors disagree about a change there are processes for Resolving_disputes. You can discuss a proposed change on the article's talk page - see the Talk link (or tab) in the article header. Start a new section at the bottom of the talk page as necessary.

In the particular case of this change please see Neutral_point_of_view: an article must represent "all significant views that have been published by reliable sources. This is non-negotiable and expected of all articles and all editors". Please add one or two references to reliable sources dealing with this interpretation of the mentioned Bible texts if you wish to make this change. Mirokado (talk) 09:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

In conclusion, here are some links which were posted on my talk page when I started editing:

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mirokado (talk) 09:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Earth:Radiometric Dating
A tag has been placed on Earth:Radiometric Dating requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shadowjams (talk) 07:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2011
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Expanding Earth, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. ''Please don't mark edits minor unless they are simply typos, etc. And changing 'suggesting' to 'confirming' is not acceptable as Maxlow doesn't make the claim and Wikipedia in any case can't make that claim. It could attribute it to a named person if they are a reliable source and explicitly say 'confirming'. '' Dougweller (talk) 12:28, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Number of the Beast
Reverted you - this was based on a self-published document, it fails to show significance per WP:UNDUE as well. And as this is a WP:BLP it would require several independent clearly significant and reliable sources. Dougweller (talk) 07:51, 7 September 2014 (UTC)