User talk:Raqib Zaman

April 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Stephen Harper, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please see the talk page and edit history for WP:Consensus regarding adding economist in the lead paragraph. WildComet (talk) 21:11, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Harper. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''There is an active discussion over at Talk:Stephen Harper regarding the addition of economist in the lead sentence. As there is presently no consensus to include it, please stop adding it.'' WildComet (talk) 03:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Film plots
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Your recent editing history at The Godfather Part III shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 09:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Adobe CEOs
Hello, Raqib Zaman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Adobe CEOs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Justin Trudeau
I noticed that you have recently edited the Justin Trudeau article. Please read the Justin Trudeau talk page, and consider joining the discussion.Peerreviewededitor (talk) 05:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Hi Raqib Zaman! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Rishi Sunak that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Politanvm talk 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rishi Sunak, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, Raqib Zaman, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Spicy (talk) 05:40, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notices
Newimpartial (talk) 08:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Raqib Zaman. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Salvio giuliano 23:23, 21 February 2023 (UTC) Raqib Zaman (talk) 04:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Raqib Zaman (talk) 03:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Raqib Zaman (talk) 02:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Raqib, you claim you did not know that using multiple accounts was not allowed and, yet, you were about this in August 2022. Why did you not stop engaging in sock puppetry then? Salvio giuliano 18:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)