User talk:RaqiwasSushi/sandbox

Summary of bias disagreement. Moot now since another user restored

<!-- I am RaqiwasSushi -- disagreement about bias with 2600:...

The following entry has been removed twice: (current text shown)


 * United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, in a break from normal office policy of avoiding politics, says U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump, if elected, would be dangerous from an international point of view because of his comments about deporting undocumented immigrants, barring Muslims from entering the country, and employing torture tactics. (The New York Times) (Reuters via The Himalayan Times) (BBC)
 * Russian UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin says Zeid shouldn't criticize heads of state and government. [http://www.dw.com/en/un-rights-chief-trump-would-be-dangerous-if-elected/a-36023164 (Deutsche Welle)

=
=========================================================

Summary A. I posted entry.

B. IP user removed it at 12:32, October 12, 2016‎ with following two remarks: (1) (Undid revision 744017305 by RaqiwasSushi and there we have it .... BIAS ..... - no one cares about this guy's opinion - he is not part of the voting poll for the election) (2) (he does not pay taxes here - and cherry-picking someone that I guess agrees with your political propaganda is the worst kind of bias)

''C. At 13:09, October 12, 2016‎, I restored entry with comment, (This is international news, reported throughout the world, links added are representative |Impact on election is unknown, but that's not relevant here; 2nd item addresses rebuttal).
 * Ca. I advised 2600 on IP user's talk page with:
 * Please see comment with my re-post. This is an unusual event. Bias? Nope. My personal views -- I will not vote for Trump -- are not involved in adding this item. From NYT article
 * "Mr. al-Hussein emphasized that his office tried to stay out of politics, but he added that if an election could lead to an increased use of torture or to the persecution of 'vulnerable communities in a way that suggests that they may well be deprived of their human rights, then I think it is incumbent to say so.'"''
 * Comments appreciated. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 17:22, 12 October 2016 (UTC)''

D. At 21:24, October 12, 2016. removed again by 2600 with following remark: (removed blatant bias))
 * Da At 21:51, October 12, 2016, 2600 completely restored event and at
 * Db At 21:51, October 12, 2016‎ deleted again with comment, (removed bias by single use ip anon sock.)


 * I don't understand this comment. If alleging I'm a sock, I'm not. I also am not 'anon IP,' registered as RaqiwasSushi, and have been so since June 2010.

Restoring event now, with comment, (entry of this event is not biased, al-hussein said it based on his own views, it is not favorable to Mr. Trump but it's what the UN commissioner said; Is there bias by removing it?) -->