User talk:RareSterling

February 2019
Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Gorham Manufacturing Company— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:15, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

If you are going to block me from posting historic images, claiming that I am using it for advertising then you better take off the external links directing people to silverqueen and replacements under Reed and Barron, Gorham, Wallace and every other silver manufacturer or I’m going to have my attorney contact you. You seem to allow other to post external links to their we buy silver web site and all I’m trying to do is post 100 year old images which are way more valuable than those post. Discrimination is a serious problem and maybe your being paid off. My attorney will find out in court RareSterling (talk) 21:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Silverqueen external link under every silver maker
You seem to allow another buyer post useless links but I can’t post 100 year old rare photos that I am the only one with? Seriously? You being paid off? RareSterling (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Agent00x (talk) 22:44, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. 331dot (talk) 22:46, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

As you make a legal threat above, I have removed your talk page access. Once the threat is withdrawn or resolved, you may request unblock as instructed above. You can pursue your grievances in the courts of your country or on Wikipedia, but not both. 331dot (talk) 22:48, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a link farm or other collection of every link related to a subject. Nor does every company in a field merit inclusion here; Wikipedia policies like company notability determine what content Wikipedia has. Furthermore, it is a conflict of interest for you to post links about your own company. Please review that and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2019 (UTC)