User talk:Ras9687

June 2020
Hello, I'm Attomir. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Angewandte Chemie have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. – attomir (talk &#124; contribs) 21:46, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Would it have helped if i posted references Ras9687 (talk) 21:47, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Unlikely, as what you added is unlikely to be true. – attomir (talk &#124; contribs) 21:50, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

They published an article which enumerated many ways in which diversity in the sciences is bad Ras9687 (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If there was such a racist article and there was a major controversy about it, then maybe. It needs to be written about by a source Wikipedia considers reliable for such claim, and should actually be rather major controversy, so not constitute undue weight. Then a description of it in some section of an article body would be acceptable. This is something completely different than adding "occasionally publishes racist articles" to article lead, which looked as if it was written in anger. I won't even start to enumerate what was wrong with it and I wonder why you thought writing it was a good thing to do. If you now want to start looking for sources that prove your point, rather than a basis for neutral description (if any description is warranted), then I advise against it. Wikipedia is for emotionless description, not for activism. – attomir (talk &#124; contribs) 22:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Having said all that, can you post the link to reference here? I'd like to see what this is all about. – attomir (talk &#124; contribs) 23:10, 6 June 2020 (UTC)