User talk:Rasa9497

Proposed deletion of Tanya hosch
Hello, Rasa9497. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tanya hosch, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Tanya hosch to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Falkirks 01:31, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mischa schubert


A tag has been placed on Mischa schubert, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ignatz mice•talk 02:44, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I declined the above CSLD because the article makes several claims of notability. However, please be aware that this article must adhere to our policy on biographies of living persons, which requires strong sourcing for any statements. If you are unable to provide these sources in a timely manner, the article will be proposed for deletion. Thanks, and happy editing! -- jonny - m t  02:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)