User talk:Rasal Lia

October 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to LIA has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: LIA was changed by Rasal Lia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.947897 on 2017-10-09T05:37:19+00:00.
 * Please don't make that edit again--it's not in line with any of our policies. Please promote your religion on another website. Drmies (talk) 05:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Rasal Lia, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Rasal Lia, please be aware that, as says above, Wikipedia is not for promoting anything, including religious paths. In addition, disambiguation pages are for guiding the reader to the correct page, not for listing every possible relevant term; so the LIA you are attempting to list would need to have an article first. Please read this page summarizing the requirements for a new article, and if you believe there is sufficient independent coverage of LIA, consider submitting a draft via the Articles for Creation process. You should not write it up unless there is sufficient independent coverage, and you should use Articles for Creation because of your conflict of interest. If you decide to do this, good luck, and the volunteers there will give you advice on meeting our requirements. But you cannot just shoehorn the topic into a disambiguation page. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hard Core Sergeants


The article Hard Core Sergeants has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail GNG - the reference given is a war memory - we need reliable sources to demonstrate notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hardcore Sergeants


The article Hardcore Sergeants has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail GNG - the reference given is a war memory - we need reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Duplicate of Hard Core Sergeants"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Hardcore Of Sergeants


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Hardcore Of Sergeants. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Hardcore Sergeants. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Hardcore Sergeants. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 07:12, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hard Core Sergeants


A tag has been placed on Hard Core Sergeants, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 15:39, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Hard Core Sergeants for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hard Core Sergeants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hard Core Sergeants until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Mahfuz Alam Beg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahfuz Alam Beg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mahfuz Alam Beg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 02:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)