User talk:Rasellers

Maybe I should look into a multiple account spam bot... That could keep you busy. IP spoofers are pretty simple to use as well.
 * Wow, you sure know a lot about computer technology for a "disabled/retired police officer" on a pension. Knock yourself out, grandpa. ... disco spinster   talk

The chance that even a few people see it is all that matters. You are writing for them, you are on their payroll, this is costing them time, and money. That is my goal...


 * This is Wikipedia. There's nothing that this site can do for your problem. ... disco spinster   talk  13:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Recent edits to BI-LO (United States)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the BI-LO (United States) article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 13:45, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BI-LO (United States) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: BI-LO (United States) was changed by Rasellers (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918643 on 2014-10-08T13:57:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:57, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to BI-LO (United States). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  14:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to BI-LO (United States) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ... disco spinster   talk  14:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to BI-LO (United States). ... disco spinster   talk  14:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC) You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. ... disco spinster   talk  14:11, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 14:31, 8 October 2014 (UTC)