User talk:Rashadqazi

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Kumta. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 09:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Goa, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Goa was changed by Rashadqazi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.919298 on 2011-11-15T10:49:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nawayath, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:53, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kumta shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. ''Stop revert warring. If you fail to stop, I'll report you and you will be blocked from editing. Stop adding unencyclopedic content to articles. See WP:NOT for more.'' &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Respond here instead of blindly reverting. Also see WP:BRD. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:58, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kumta, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash;  Abhishek  Talk 13:09, 24 November 2011 (UTC)