User talk:Rashiddo

You are not the King of Portugal, Mexico, or any other region. Stop adding false information to the database. This is your only warning; any further infractions will lead to your being blocked indefinitely. DS (talk) 14:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olivia Bell


The article Olivia Bell has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Breawycker (talk to me!) 17:38, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Linnet Rose


A tag has been placed on Linnet Rose requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --  Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 18:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Advice
Read WP:BIO and WP:RS. (Or WP:CORP, WP:ATHLETE or WP:BAND if you're planning to expand.) Remember that if someone's still at Art School, they are going to be difficult to show notability on. Where a lot of people go wrong is that they take 'Wikipedia is free' the wrong way. Sure, it is free. No annual subscription, no nothing. But, it is not without rules and guidelines. And, when people start a new article, there's nothing that pops up and says, 'Hang on, have you read.....'. I think there ought to be, but there ain't - not yet, there ain't. I'm not the only one who thinks that. So, don't take it bad that you've been deleted. Until you get used to the place, start articles in your userspace (ask if not sure), get all the refs (or a few at least), and then ask an admin or a regular for an opinion. Remember BLPs (bios of living people) MUST have at least one reliable ref (and everything else is safer with one too), but the more the merrier. Good luck. Don't be afraid to ask. Peridon (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rosanna Bell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosanna Bell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rosanna Bell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mathonius (talk) 20:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)