User talk:Rashkeqamar

April 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to India does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Baahubali2
Plz update...its 850 crores RohanX123 (talk) 09:21, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

About Bahubali
Hello Bahubali is a Telugu Film. All its content is First Made in Telugu and then Dubbed to more than 5 languages like Tamil,malayalam,kannada,Hindi & English. Sir you can't give credit to Tamil..It's Telugu film.Even if an actor acts in the film from other lang ,it don't become Tamil film..If that is the case.we should change for thousands of films.i.humbly request you to change the lang section from Telugu Tamil to only Telugu and delete tamil Ramtejvarma (talk) 10:08, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Babhubali the beginning
Hello Also please delete Tamil from the lang list in Bahubali the beginning also Ramtejvarma (talk) 10:12, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Diff: The values you changed are no longer consistent with the references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:31, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

And re: this, if you want to limit the gross values of Hindi films to not include dubs, you need to seek consensus via discussion on the article's talk page. You are changing the status quo with no authority to do so and you have been reverted, so per WP:BRD, you need to seek consensus. Typically when we talk about worldwide gross, we're talking about all money made in theatres, and this would intuitively include dubs. When a new Marvel Avengers film is released in China, do you think they only show it in English? No, they dub it, and we include those figures. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

I consider this vandalism as well, since the source clearly says 730 crore worldwide, not 718. Also, you removed the Estimation template, which is not constructive. That belongs there per WT:ICTF consensus. Check archives. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

And this would be considered vandalism as well, since the source says 792 crore, not 743. If you vandalize an article again, your editing privileges will be revoked. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:03, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Warning re: copyright violation
Re: this talk page edit, it is a very basic concept in the world of academia that you do not copy content from one place and paste it into another. This is something that most children learn in school. "Don't copy off your neighbor." "Don't copy from the encyclopedia." No different here. All prose is considered protected by copyright the moment it is "fixed" or published. See Berne convention. Copying content is intellectually dishonest and lazy, I personally have no tolerance for it, and it will absolutely result in the interruption of your editing privileges should you do it again. There are times when we can extract small excerpts under fair use, but there are rules to that as well. We typically format quotations using quote marks and we don't copy entire blocks of text as you did from this source. Familiarise yourself with our copyright policies. I've had to redact your comment. If you wish to re-frame your post, you will need to do so entirely in your own words. Should do so, please place your comment underneath the response from Rajan51. Do not touch the redacted template, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Cattle slaughter in India. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Tyler Durden  (talk)  15:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cattle slaughter in India. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''The sources you cited do not directly support the content you have written. Your edits clearly constitute as WP:OR. Also, until there is WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page, you are bound to maintain WP:STATUSQUO.''  Tyler Durden  (talk)  18:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ARBIPA sanctions alert
 Tyler Durden  (talk)  19:25, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bhakti Rathod


The article Bhakti Rathod has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable actor. Fails WP:NACTOR"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coderzombie (talk) 19:12, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhakti Rathod for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhakti Rathod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bhakti Rathod until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Coderzombie (talk) 19:31, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your 2003 source was not appropriate for 2015 Indian Science Congress ancient aircraft controversy
It clearly wasn't a comment on the Congress so I've reverted you. Please don't do this sort of thing again. Doug Weller talk 17:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Unnecessary citations
Please do not add extraneous citations like you did at WP:Tufail Ahmed. Please see WP:CITEKILL. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions reminder
Hello Raskeqamar, you have added a contentious WP:LABEL at Burhan Wani, which was just rejected by. This is a sure fire way of inviting sanctions. I hope it was unintentional, and you will refrain from such edits in future. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Toilet
Re: this, subjective, hyperbolic terms like "blockbuster", "super hit", "failure" and "flop" are not welcome in this neutral encyclopedia. We care more about objective data, and when the majority of reliable sources have a general opinion on a film's performance, we still use neutral wording.

Re: this, what's significant about a five-day total? Noting the first day is reasonable. Noting the first weekend is reasonable. Noting the first week is reasonable. But five days? What's the point of that? Will you come back and note the 9 day total? The 17 day total? The 364 day total?

Re: this, we write for a global audience, so using abbreviations that are known only to Indians within a specific geographical region is not how we typically do business. You should be writing for a global audience and clarifying such abbreviations as you write. See WP:ABBREV. Should you wish to resubmit this content with the above in mind, that would be nice. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:07, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Sources generally not required in lead
hi. Thanks, but see WP:LEAD20. Material sourced in the body of the article doesn't need sourcing in the lead. Sorry, WP:LEAD, can't fix that on my iPad as a drop down is in the way. Doug Weller talk 06:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Doug Weller talk 06:34, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Akbar. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sana Dua


The article Sana Dua has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "1st Runner-up in Indian beauty pageant. Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. World&#39;s Lamest Critic (talk) 03:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sana Dua for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sana Dua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sana Dua until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. World&#39;s Lamest Critic (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Other Backward Castes does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Please stop uploading copyrighted images to Commons and trying to use them here. It is against our policies (and not legal). Thanks. World&#39;s Lamest Critic (talk) 03:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Briana Blair


The article Briana Blair has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:PORNBIO only award nominations with no wins"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Briana Blair


A tag has been placed on Briana Blair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:18, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Yasmin Scott


The article Yasmin Scott has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO notability. Trivial tabloid coverage, no major accomplishments."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 14:43, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Yasmin Scott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yasmin Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yasmin Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:50, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions (biographies of living people)
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kristine Zedek


A tag has been placed on Kristine Zedek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Gbawden (talk) 08:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Kristine Zedek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristine Zedek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kristine Zedek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 10:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Warning
You added poor quality content here and then after it was removed, you reinserted it with a deceptive summary "revert vandalism". THat is not on. Given that you are the one looking to add content, you have to discuss on the talk page to seek inclusion. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:26, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red
--Ipigott (talk) 10:45, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Feroze Gandhi does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 19:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hi, I appreciate your contributions to the article Virat Kohli, but it is always advisable to wait for the completion of the match to update statistics and relevant records. Also, please leave an edit summary after editing. It helps other editors to monitor the activity in an article. Thanks. MT TrainDiscuss 12:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:NPA
Refrain from making personal attacks such as you did on, those edits were not vandalism. Raymond3023 (talk) 03:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Nastik (2018 film)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nastik (2018 film), Rashkeqamar!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Happy Holidays text.png Hello Rashkeqamar: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas and Season's Greetings.

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 20:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill, 2017, Rashkeqamar!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Happy Holidays text.png Hello Rashkeqamar: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

"Tik Tik Tik (2017 film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tik Tik Tik (2017 film). Since you had some involvement with the Tik Tik Tik (2017 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Kailash29792 (talk)  10:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nastik (upcoming film)


The article Nastik (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not satisfy any version of film notability guidelines because the film seems to be in development limbo, so that an article is crystal balling."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)