User talk:Ratchicken

"Collage" in the Regina article
Splendid -- vastly improves what was there before. My congratulations. The current photo of the Arts Centre is not great. I won't be in Regina in the immediate future to take another. Any chance that it can be replaced otherwise? Would be nice if it could be from the bridge or the north side of the lake, showing both a reasonably full picture of the building and bit of the park setting? Masalai (talk) 03:11, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

I have tentatively removed your collage of Regina as it has been tagged as an uncredited derivative work on Commons (and therefore a copyright violation). In the source field you claim the collage is your own work, but it appears to incorporate photographs by other users, such as commons:User:Drm310. You need to either confirm that you are the same photographer as these other images (in which case, why are you using multiple accounts?) and/or clearly indicate which other accounts' photos you have incorporated into the collage so that they can be credited in accordance with the licence. —Psychonaut (talk) 06:47, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for attending to the licensing issue! Your collage certainly improves the appearance of the article. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)