User talk:Ratherthanflesh

This article has recently been vandalised many times, with someone adding three definitions of what he himself thinks is awesome, which is generally along the lines of "the drummer of band X is awesome!". If this goes on I'm going to semi-protect this article. J I P | Talk 09:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

What I'm adding is not 'silliness". Awesomeness is a philosophical belief that is starting to sweep university campuses.  It does have a silly name, but it in itself is not silliness.  If you think about the ideology behind it, it does give a very good standpoint on life. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by EncycloMan (talk • contribs).


 * Do we really want to define "awesome" (Matt Batey) in Wikipedia? Wiktionary does not ban an extended discussion of a word or its varied usage. Alexander 007 11:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The problem is, there are many other things named "Awesome", many of which have Wikipedia articles. We need this article as a disambiguation between them. J I P  | Talk 11:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Di Patria.

You knew someone was going to say it. :P --Onlynameicanget 01:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't actually. It does make me wonder if we'll ever have "featured disambiguation" pages.  i kan reed 03:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Defintion of awesome is :NOT MIZ BECAUSE THE MIZ SUCKS