User talk:Rathgic

January 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Prime number are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 04:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * On a side note, 2 a prime number as it satisfies several equivalent definitions.  –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 04:06, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

1 it is not my thoughts and my feelings. You can not create a reality that doesn't exist. there are no numbers in existence below 2 re "prime" however you otherwise limit it. they may be other things about the number 2 one want's to consider as one chooses to but not as an equivilant to a discussion of prime numbers as defined that does not consider 1 to be an acceptable number. And it is not my thoughts or feelings. It is a reality that you can create any prime number of anysize you want at any time. THAT IS A FACT NOT AN OPINION. A program does exist iT WOULD BE LIKE SAYING I have discovered the largest even number. But don't misunderstand. Not my job to supervise wikipedia. I offer the information. That's the limits of my job discrption. I don't give a damn what wikipedia does with it. that's your job not mine. You lose. I lose nothing. Goodby