User talk:Rationabilis

As one of the admins frequently working with academic articles, it is my opinion that Buchener is notable, seen most easily because of the memberships in national academies which meets WP:PROF. You were quite right to ignore the afc rejection, which is not binding. TThe article could nonetheless use some additional material, particularly an indication citation counts for his 2 or 3 most cited papers.

In addition, please remove adjectives such as "significantly", unless you can give an exact 3rd party quotation. The degree to which the work is significant is shown more objectively by the citations.

However, you seem to be using also the user name Rationablia. This is probably a typo, but it's better to pick one name and keep to it.  DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)