User talk:Ratiowalt

March 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Credit Karma, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 17:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Fixed Now Ratiowalt (talk) 17:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Credit Karma. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 17:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The company offer other service than credit score and they company serve other nation then USA, Those are official, Refer the site Ratiowalt (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Title=ratiowalt


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Title=ratiowalt, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. creffett (talk) 18:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. creffett (talk) 18:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)