User talk:Ratnahastin/Archive 3

Siachen Base Camp (Pakistan) Declined Reason
Greetings,

With reference to the page Siachen Base Camp (Pakistan) which I wrote, I recieved a notification of it being declined by you.

Can you kindly tell me what particular part was problematic? I wish to rectify that so that I may publish this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markhor777 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Neet Scam 2024
Hey!

Just wanted to drop a quick message in regards to the above - I've moved your acceptance to National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy per WP:NPOVTITLE - just a curtesy note and awareness of the above if you come across similar before. I couldn't really find any sourcing using the previous title and references to "scam" seemed to not be universal in the sources the article cited. The accepted page also had some copyvio issues and close paraphrasing which were missed on your review. It also needed substantial copyediting to get into the right state for mainspace, but I'm less worried about this as this isn't a criteria for review. Thanks for reviewing it, however just wanted to flag up the copyvio check in particular being missed as there were several warning flags as to there being copy-paste issues - happy to discuss this offline if you wish? I messed up as well by removing them and failing to tag them for revdel, so I'm hardly perfect in this case either! Mdann52 (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I think 2024 NEET controversy would be the better title. Ratnahastin  (talk) 14:29, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm open to discussing it - especially if NEET is the common name (whether we need the year, though, is another question, see WP:DAB. Feel free to start a move discussion, however having "scam" in the title is (usually) a red flag for me. Mdann52 (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

Rajput Mughal marriage alliances
I'm not a regular at AfD - does a close of "No Consensus" mean you can "blank the page, delete its history, and redirect"? Especially when you yourself were the nom? Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/my edits ) 03:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * "No consensus" means there is no agreement over any outcome. Since enough editors supported drafting and title change I went along with that. Also see this discussion. Ratnahastin  (talk) 03:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * But you have not just draftified the article. You've redirected the draft to another article which carries over no material that discusses the specific dynamic between Rajputs and Mughals. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/my edits ) 04:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Reading it more closely, it appears the new article indeed includes it, but under Political marriages in India, which seems pretty random to me. Why aren't the Mughals under their own section? Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/my edits ) 04:14, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You are free to create a section of Mughals for the instances that involved political marriages. Ratnahastin  (talk) 04:29, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Will do! I will be busy until August though.
 * Could you also explain why you went through a roundabout process of draftifying the page (in the process getting the original title deleted), changing the draft title, and then mainspacing the new title with "newly" created redirects from the old title? Now when you click on Rajput Mughal marriage alliances (and go to the page itself, not the Political marriages page) and check its history, it appears as though "Rajput Mughal marriage alliances" never existed and was only created by you as a redirect. I don't have much experience with forking and merging articles (the only one I've ever done is New Parliament House, New Delhi which was a fairly straightforward affair) so I want to know if this is a normal thing to do.
 * Lastly, I don't know why you called this section SYNTH. All of it is cited to recent books and follows a logical order (although poor in prose). WP:SYNTH refers specifically to original research that combines facts from multiple sources to make a claim that no single source did - aka doing the work of a secondary source. I do not see how that could possibly apply to the lead section that you removed. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI ( talk to me!/my edits ) 05:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Alexandra Larosa
Hi, I wanted to warn you that the draft that you rightly rejected (among other things badly titled but that's the least of the problems) actually replicates an article already present on the English Wikipedia, Roxelana. Sira Aspera (talk) 13:00, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding deletion discussion on Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) article
Hi,

The article Nizam's Carnatic campaigns (1725-27) has been proposed for deletion.

You may participate in the deletion discussion of this article.

Regards. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 19:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. Ratnahastin  (talk) 09:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding a sock user
I've found 2 more socks of Aditya Nakul, User:Roberthooke003 and User:Hipnotics77 Hashid Khan (talk) 07:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)


 * @Ratnahastin Roberthooke003 has even reported you as a sock Here Hashid Khan (talk) 07:07, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for notifying me, I've added them to the SPI, in regards to Hipnotics77, I believe they are a sock of Ribosome786. See this for more information. Ratnahastin  (talk) 07:16, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Improper source
Hello i wanted to ask how can i properly source in my draft. Gara67 (talk) 18:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Request on 24 June 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Rupumped
Thank you for your review of my draft page. You were right: the article did come across as similar to an advertisement. I have endeavored to make the entry more encyclopedic and resubmitted the page for review. Please let me know if you would recommend additional edits. Also, please note that all of the references cited were independent and/or peer-reviewed.

Rupumped (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Bokan (clan)
You probably confused it with Bokan (surname). - Altenmann >talk 15:21, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * This redirect was a part of large scale page move vandalism by a sockfarm and subsequent hijacking as a caste article . But I think you're correct,i should've restored this revision instead.  Ratnahastin  (talk) 15:29, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Artemis 6
can you take a look at the draft for Artemis 6 - the article is cited now Thistheyear2023 (talk) 01:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Rajiv Dixit. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.