User talk:Ratters77

Nomination of Leighton Gage for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leighton Gage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leighton Gage until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Brown (talk) 20:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Leighton Gage do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Your edit here to Leighton Gage was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=leighton+gage&aq=f) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

Note that I've cleaned up the Leighton Gage article to conform with the manual of style, added references, and removed some promotional language. As such I've cleared the clean up tags. As you have a conflict of interest, you will need to take care in any editting of the article. If you wish to edit the article, I'd be more than willing to assist you to ensure that the article continues to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. I also noted that you used the term "we" in the deletion discussion. WP:NOSHARE documents the policy on user account sharing. If it truly is more than one person using the account, I suggest strongly that each person register their own account. I hope this infromation is useful to you. Cheers! -- Whpq (talk) 18:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)