User talk:Rattigan9012

Editing concerns

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox.  -- K u k i ni  hablame aqui 22:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Fastflow
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fastflow, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fastflow.co.uk. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:12, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Removing speedy deletion templates 	 Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.

Finding and using sources
Wikipedia articles need reliable sources for articles. yields some results, which you might be able to integrate in the article. Phlegm Rooster (talk) 23:10, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Recreation of Fastflow
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you.


 * Also, I would suggest working on your article in the sandbox before you actually create it to avoid another speedy deletion. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 23:11, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion.

Speedy deletion nomination of Fastflow


A tag has been placed on Fastflow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.

Please note: All the foregoing is "boilerplate" text that results from placing a formal notification tag on your talk page. In addition to the problem that text describes, this article is also problematic in that it includes no references to reliable sources such as independent, mainstream newspapers or magazines that demonstrate that this company is  notable under Wikipedia's standards for companies. Also, I notice from its logs that the article was previously deleted, on 8 July 2008, as advertising. You may be able to save it if you can find such reliable sources that establish the company as notable according to Wikipedia's meaning of that term. – OhioStandard  (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)