User talk:Rauchwerger

Nomination of Harvard Design Magazine for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harvard Design Magazine, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Harvard Design Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello Rauchwerger. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Harvard Design Magazine, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rauchwerger. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. What appears to be editing on behalf of their behalf at the time what appears to be public relations editing occurred. Graywalls (talk) 03:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @Graywalls, I don't think Rauchwerger was ever paid by Harvard but he was closely involved with the magazine when he made those edits 9 years ago. He's long since moved on to much bigger things. I don't know if he'll edit here again (I hope he will) but I think that for now you can assume your message answered.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 21:18, 11 July 2023 (UTC)