User talk:Raulalbertopenaranda

March 2019
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Invasion of Normandy, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 09:10, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

August 2022
Edits like the one you made on Evo Morales are disruptive. Articles on Wikipedia must reflect a neutral point of view and have reliable sourcing, and should not editorialize. aismallard (talk) 01:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * How can be “disruptive” if I added something in a paragraph that already mentions other critiques to his tenure? The paragraph mentions “democratic backsliding”, “illegal cocaine production”, and that he didn’t respect environmentalist and indigenous rights. To those four aspects I only added one more, that he is also accused of harassing the media, which is amply recognized by numerous reports of credible sources, among them HRW, CPJ, RSF and others. Even more: Freedom House put Evo Morales in the cover of its 2017 report together with other authoritarian leaders, like Putin and Erdogan. In that report, Bolivia went down fifteen spots in the international ranking of freedom of the press, and was ranked 110th in the world.
 * Links:
 * https://monitor.civicus.org/updates/2021/05/17/bolivia-ranked-110-reporters-without-borders-world-press-freedom-index/
 * https://freedomhouse.org/country/bolivia/freedom-world/2018
 * https://cpj.org/es/americas-es/bolivia-es/2016/
 * https://correodelsur.com/politica/20170429_bolivia-cae-en-ranking-de-libertad-de-prensa.html
 * I respectfully believe that not mentioning that Morales harassed the press avoids one of the key allegations against him and so inhibits the big public to grasp an important fact. Raul Penaranda (talk) 14:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)