User talk:RavenHN

Hi Fire Star, I am keen to present a balanced view, and would welcome your guidance on how to do that. I am a great fan of Wikipedia; the benefits it brings to the world are astounding. It is inevitable that media attention is drawn to controversy, but there have been many TV and published articles about other aspects that are not reflected here. Also, can you help me understand the relevance of the "See Also" section. Respectfully. -- RavenHN 18:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Greetings.

You've been removing sourced information about a controversy over Dahn yoga from that article. Since the vast majority of notable media attention the practise has received revolves around the controversy, it looks like you are trying to sanitise the article to make it more of an advertisement for Dahn Yoga than an encyclopaedia article. I am going to bring the issue up to a wider audience of Wikipedia editors. --Fire Star 火星 13:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)