User talk:RavenPurity

Nonsense of Sorudo
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sorudo, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sorudo provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sorudo, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sorudo
I have nominated Sorudo, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Sorudo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. J- ſtan ContribsUser page 01:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorudo AfD

 * Any further responses to me should be left on my talk page. I won't have you derail the discussion any further. JuJube (talk) 15:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. J- ſtan ContribsUser page 19:22, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Policy states that articles are not to be submitted to AfD simple because of lack of sources, thus, I'm following policy, you aren't.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going to say this VERY slowly, since it seems to escape people's comprehension: The.Deletion.Policy.Clearly.States.That.There.Is.Nothing.Wrong.With.The.Article.And.Should.Not.Be.Submitted.To.AfD.Thus.All.AFD.Tags.Added.To.The.Page.Are.Considered.Vandalism.And.Will.Be.Reverted. RavenPurity (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Consensus is what we use here, and thus far, and according to the current consensus on the AfD page, that article will be deleted. Also, you will be blocked if you continue to remove the AfD tag, so please refrain from doing so.  - Rjd0060 (talk) 22:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Since the page shouldn't be submitted anyway, according to policy, the AfD page is non valid, and cannot be taken into account. RavenPurity (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Clearly you are not familiar with the way we do things here, and people are trying to help you understand, so please quit being disruptive. See our Deletion process, and read the points people have made on the AFD page. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:00, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Clearly you don't read the pages you link too, I've already quoted the exact passage on the Sorudo talk pages which nulifies the AfD, and all the policies which people have falsely been reffering as a reason for AfD RavenPurity (talk) 23:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:55, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No hard feelings? J- ſtan ContribsUser page 23:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)