User talk:RavenThePackIsBack

In response to your feedback
If you have believe the articles has errors, you can fix the information yourself. However, I would encourage you to use references if possible (see Citing sources), to verify the information.


 * Thank you! Will make some updates to that entry. RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 23:14, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

SwisterTwister  talk  04:36, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

In response to your feedback
I am glad that your Wikipedia experience is going well and that you are happy! Thank you for your feedback and thank you for your contributions! For more help on getting started, please look at Help desk and the help pages.

If you need help editing:
 * Check out the tutorial.
 * Wanting to create an article? Use the article wizard.
 * See the manual.

If you need any help in the future please feel free to leave a message on my talk page.

Regards,

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

August 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mdann52 (talk) 11:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

I have used the talk page over and over and the contributions I have made to this article are legitimate as you can see by the new section. This is unfair treatment. Why isn't the content itself being addressed? Why is it being erased? That's not fair. Look at what I left on the talk page and no one addresses it. RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 17:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

I would really like somebody to step in and say why the additions to this article are being scrubbed. How is this a community if someone comes along and adds stuff and then someone else just erases it because he feels entitled. That's not right. RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 17:27, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello RavenThePackIsBack and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. I have a feeling that IP is you..... Mdann52 (talk) 06:03, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

I am using one sign on and one sign on only. RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 17:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Can someone help with my editing questions? RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 17:45, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Jimmy McDaniels for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Yworo (talk) 20:20, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey! You took my comment out! That was me they asked to comment and I did! Why did you take it out? RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

There was a guy who left a comment here named Dennis and then he erased it RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 21:31, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Someone blocked me and that's totally unfair! What kinda investigation was that? All he said was "obvious sock." Can someone please assist me? This is not right. RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 22:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The duck test was applied. In short, it means "if you appear after X vanishes/is blocked/banned, doing the same things as X, odds are you are X". In this case the evidence, as considered by your behavior, makes it obvious that you are the same user as, who was "topic-banned from any articles related to Jason Leopold and Truthout, broadly construed." , and that you created this account in an attempt to evade your topic ban on those subjects. This is not a legitimate use of an alternate account and, therefore, this account has been blocked. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

That makes a lot of sense. NOT! I registered this year. That whole other stuff happened in 2010 with that other dude that they keep talking about! What are you talking about? RavenThePackIsBack (talk) 23:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:GAB is the guide to unblocks. The timing of your registration is meaningless, as some puppetmasters are much older.  I stand by the original determination and block.  Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 13:11, 18 August 2012 (UTC)