User talk:Ravi prakash 1234

Hello, I reverted your edit because it appears to be vandalism. If you feel anything to edit, please mention your views in talk page. Thank you Fire star on heat (talk) 08:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

I already told you about your edits. Please add citation if you make edit. Add proper citations. Otherwise mention your views in talk page. Don't start edit war. Thank you and have a nice day. Fire star on heat (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Citations means what? How can I add citations? Its a fact. Mr./Miss Fire star on heat; Mr Ratan375 is intentionally changing my edits. Iam not doing any war. Mr Ratan375 seems to be fan of another mythological hero Karn. Thus he is anti-Arjun kind of thing. Iam making clear that Iam not fan of any of them but please see my edit carefully. I also saw that Ratan375 had dispute with you. Wikipedia should contain truth but not false stories.

June 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Vijaya (bow), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

yes. Mr Ratan 375 added false content from improper sources. It was clear. there were some disputes also. I think you know better than all of them. kindly check into it. those citations are improper

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Vijaya (bow). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC) But those sources are incorrect

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Vijaya (bow), you may be blocked from editing.   Visioncurve  Haec lux solis, relinquentes senex mundi 10:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Arjuna; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 10:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Arjuna, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —— Serial # 11:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Reverting of drona parva
Can you give my any proof of your revision .there is no proof of your revision .please do not spread vandalism and disruptive editing Vansh stalin (talk) 15:09, 14 July 2020 (UTC)