User talk:Ravichandar84/Archive 11

{| cellpadding="10" cellspacing="8" style="background-color: red; border: 1px solid red;; vertical-align: top;"
 * colspan="2" style="padding: 0;" |
 * style="width: 68%; background-color: #EFF8FF; border: 1px solid #8888aa; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="3" |
 * style="width: 68%; background-color: #EFF8FF; border: 1px solid #8888aa; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top;" rowspan="3" |

Speedy deletion of Amrutanjan
A tag has been placed on Amrutanjan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 15:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Copy of my reply to your note on my talk
The hangon tag doesn't automatically save an article...it is supposed to lead to the talk page where an explanation of why it should be saved should be given. The article was nommed and deleted because it doesn't appear to meet WP:CORP. However, upon review, I can see that with further development, such justification could be met, so I moved the text that you were working on over to a sandbox for you, at User:Ravichandar84/sandbox2. Hope that helps. (copy of this message also on your talk.)  AK Radecki Speaketh  15:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Kindly unblock me
Your current IP can be softblocked so you can still edit. Would you mind saying what IP you're blocked under? Spellcast (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I just logged in and I am able to edit now. Thank you very much! I guess the block was particular to the IP. I don't know the IP I used yesterday, they are assigned so randomly. Anyway, I've mailed the admin who blocked. Can I start editing now or would it be wiser to wait for a reply and clarification from the admin before starting to edit. I also wish to apply for an IP-block-exempt. This is the second time that I had been blocked for the same reason. I don't know if I had been hard-blocked the first time around (that was in March 2007) but the blocking admin unblocked me on receiving my mail and I started after I was unblocked.- Ravichandar My coffee shop 02:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Amrutanjan
A tag has been placed on Amrutanjan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 20:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Due to the above unrelated block, I've declined the deletion request for the time being. The article remains tagged as underconstruction, which most editors respect. - auburn pilot   talk  20:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Upcoming World Development contest
Penubag has been hard at work developing awards for this project. He has completed a very professional looking medal, and is almost done with a trophy that is truly awesome - both of these awards are visually stunning.

I and a few others have been working steadily on the country outlines that will be the focus of the contest - an outline for every country of the world! They're shaping up nicely. So far, 28 of them have been moved to article space - these aren't complete, but they are complete enough to be made available for readers to benefit from them. The rest of the set still includes temporary data that was generated by template (because it matched most but not all of the countries), and before those lists can be moved to article space, all the temporary data needs to be checked for accuracy, and if incorrect it needs to be replaced with correct information.

The effort on the lists has been on 3 fronts:
 * 1) Working on the lists in article space to complete them so they will be good examples for editors working on the rest of the set (during the contest).
 * 2) Adding or correcting other data (fixing redlinks, filling in blanks, etc.).  The main type of work participants in the contest will be doing.  The reason we're doing this is to get a feel for it, to develop the fastest methods for each type of task, etc.
 * 3) Improving the overall design and implenting changes on all 247 pages, whether in article space or not.

There has been some opposition to us running the contest based on edit counts or iterations. The concern is that we should reward quality work and not quantity, for fear of crappy edits done quickly without thought just to earn an award. I pointed out that the collection of pages are drafts in the Wikipedia namespace (therefore posing no danger to article space) and that most of the work needs to be done with power tools like AWB and Linky (which are specifically designed for repetitive volumnous work), but the reply was that we shouldn't set the precedent of rewarding barnstars for numerically-based tasks, and implied the threat of continuously MfD'ing the contest if we attempted to do so (like they did with the Awards Center - I was very surprised and disappointed that participants didn't step up to defend it). So we need to be careful in determining what exactly the awards will represent, and how they will be awarded.

Since rewarding iterations (passes with AWB on all of the pages in the set) are out, we really don't need the globe-in-stand (award we were working on) anymore. Two awards should suffice.

Once we get started with the contest, I'd like to kick the whole thing off with a round of medals for those dedicated few who have worked hard on the project so far.

What do you think of all of this?

Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   00:37, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

On the band article you wrote me about,
I CSD'd the article because it did not state why the band is notable. You can fix this by stating it in the opening paragraph. Hope I helped.—  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 03:21, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Able to edit
Without knowing your IP address, or what blocks are affecting you, I'd rather not grant the exemption yet. You are welcome to continue editing, of course, but should this happen again, please use the unblock-ip code provided for you in your block message instead of unblock. This allows us to determine what block is affecting you, and therefore help you out easier. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:07, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I had been blocked as an "Open proxy". The IP range used by BSNL is 59.*.*.*. Thanks, anyway- Ravichandar My coffee shop 04:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * That doesn't help a whole lot - the software only allows us to block ranges up to 59. .*.*. The open proxy bit concerns me, however - are you using some form of anonymizing proxy to edit from? Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Nope, I don't. As I said earlier, I use a BSNL connection. BSNL assigns the IPs dynamically. I don't know about the technicalities which BSNL uses. But no, I don't use any anonymizing proxies.- Ravichandar My coffee shop 04:47, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Admin
Do you want to be one ?Taprobanus (talk) 03:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I can nominate you, ut prepare yourself for the answers99.247.129.133 (talk) 05:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Tell me when you redy then.Taprobanus (talk) 05:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi there/Undivided India
Hi there! I just realized that it was you who had proposed the merger with "British India." You may not have realized that "British India" refers to only those regions of the British Raj (i.e. India (1858-1947)) which were directly administered by the British (i.e., say, Bombay Presidency, in contrast, say to, Hyderabad State, which was a Princely State and, consequently only indirectly governed), so the merger should be with British Raj. The page British India had itself been redirected to British Raj until mid-August when an editor began to edit it as a standalone page. In fact, it is itself in the middle of an RfC that is essentially asking for the page either to be reverted to the old redirect or be redirected to the dab page British rule in India. Thanks! Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  18:38, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yup, I agree with you.  Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  16:48, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Upcoming World Development contest

 * Hi! How are you?? It has been a long time since I've met you. I am extremely sorry. I was occupied with some important work at that time and eventually forgot to message you.


 * And by the way, thank you very much for the invitation. :-) I have a few doubts. What is the purpose of creating all this - Ravichandar My coffee shop 11:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Let me see if I can alleviate your doubts by explaining the project in more detail...

We are in the process of expanding Wikipedia's outline of knowledge. The purposes of the outline (which is broken down into many pages, each containing a sub-outline) is to show how the World's knowledge fits together and interrelates, while at the same time serve as a table of contents of Wikipedia (to show how the subjects are structured in this encyclopedia). These country pages we are working on are pieces of it, and when they are done they will be displayed in the Geography section. So far, 28 of them have become complete enough to be useful to readers and have been moved there already. Check it out.

A similar project was undertaken by Encyclopædia Britannica in the late 60's and early 70's called the Propædia. While that was a sentence outline, Wikipedia's outline of knowledge is currently a topic outline (though it is already starting to expand to become a hybrid of the two types).

I think Penubag summed it up best when he said "I think Around the world is a wonderful project that really helps the encouragement and development of our encyclopedia. It greatly expands the connection between our articles, something I've long noticed Wikipedia desperately needs. This is just one small step, and a big one in fact!"

I hope I've helped put this project into perspective for you.

Thank you for supporting Wikipedia and becoming a Wikipedian. I look forward to working with you.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:13, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Say no to C#
Came upon your page. C# is the devil, just thought I'd let you know. -- Enzuru 22:35, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

EVR
Thanks Ravi. Happy Diwali. It is a good start. I have posted some comments on the article talk page.

I have to appreciate you for the wonderful articles you create and expand here including the latest one on History of Kodaikanal. Pls keep up the good work.  Docku: “what up?”  17:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Paramacharya1.jpg
The upload record shows that the uploader was User:Nagarajan knb - who was also the only contributor (outside of one who tagged it as I4). The uploader was notified of the impending deletion at User talk:Nagarajan knb. Perhaps you switched user names? - or are thinking of a different image that you uploaded? - as the history for this image does not have you connected with it. Skier Dude ( talk ) 15:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

comment!
I have seen you edit Travancore article. Would you care to provide your opinion here at Talk:Upper cloth revolt. Thanks.  Docku: “what up?”  17:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem.  Docku: “what up?”  17:27, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

P. T. Rajan
I noticed your DYK submission of P. T. Rajan and was delighted to see that there was another alumnus of Jesus College Oxford mentioned. I have great fun adding names to List of alumni of Jesus College, Oxford - do your sources happen to give dates for his matriculation/graduation? Regards, BencherliteTalk 21:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Fantastic. I'll have a hunt too and see what I can find.  Unfortunately, he's not mentioned in the main history of the college (written in 1971) but there may be a reference I've missed in one of the college magazines in the last 15 years or so that I've got.  Thanks, BencherliteTalk 08:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Ravichandar84 2
Hi, I think you made a small mistake and placed this Edtitor review request in the article namespace. :) Please move it. Thanks, --Church of emacs (Talk) 12:46, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for P. T. Rajan

 * }