User talk:Ravinder121

By Ravinder121

Ramdasias and Ravidasias are separate caste listed under constitution of India.

Ramdasia (Weaver) are the followers of 4th Sikh Guru Ramdas, whereas Ravidasias are followers of Guru Ravidas(not a weaver)

User 12.182.80.222 is vandalising by posting false information.

July 25, 2009
User Bal537 alias 12.182.80.222 is posting false information on wikipedia.

July 24,2009
User Bal537 is posting false information on Wikipedia.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 19:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Please sign your posts. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:30, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Bal
This issue is a bit outside of my expertise. Please go here so we may further understand your complaint and why it is vandalism. Thanks. Law type! snype? 12:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Bal537's Edits
Hello!!

I do not have authority to block. Please report the case at WP:AIV, at User-Reported section. The action will be taken as soon as possible.

Regards

Hitro  talk  17:19, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 11:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

not vandalism
User:Bal537's edits are not vandalism, although they are highly disruptive and seem to be unsupported original research. Please stop calling his edits vandalism, thanks. Gwen Gale (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You have again called Bal537's edits vandalism. Although I have blocked him for disruption, his edits are not vandalism. If you carry on calling his edits vandalism I may block you for making personal attacks. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I am just fed up of his false claims .Its good that you have blocked him. Ravinder121 (talk) 17:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)


 * His edits aren't vandalism, please stop calling them vandalism. Also, calling them "false claims" is a bit over the top, since some editors will read that to mean you think the editor is lying. His edits are unsupported by the sources, he has edit warred and made personal attacks and been very disruptive, he seems to be mistaken, he indeed is PoV driven, but he is not a vandal. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Please don't remove text from other user talk pages. Please confront this user. Do not start an edit war.--Cubs197 (talk) 20:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

You have been called to Chamar's talk page.--Cubs197 (talk) 20:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

I think it would be helpful if you would not post to User:Bal537's talk page, but rather, to the article talk pages. Moreover, please stop commenting on Bal537, stick to talking only about sources and content, thanks. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Following my warning to all editors at Talk:Chamar to not make personal attacks, along with my earlier warning to you above, you have done so again and I have blocked you from editing for 24 hours. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Straight out of your block, you have again made a personal attack. Moreover, you made this attack whilst blanking content from a closed project page. This bickering has gone way beyond the bounds of policy and must stop now. I have blocked you from editing for one week. If, when this block is done, you carry on with the same behaviour, the next block will either be much longer, or indefinite. I will unblock if you straightforwardly undertake not to make personal attacks of any kind: Comment only on content, not on other editors. Saying another editor is willfully posting "false information" when that editor clearly believes it to be true, however mistaken the editor may or may not be, is not on here. See also the policy on assuming good faith. If you want to edit these topics, you must cite sources or comment in a civil way on sources already given. You will not get what you want by making wanton, never-ending personal attacks. Gwen Gale (talk) 10:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC) in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Proposed deletion of Book:Ramdasia Sikh


The book Book:Ramdasia Sikh has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Books are collections of articles. This is not one. See WP:BPROD and BPROD

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the talk page of the book.

Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 09:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

blocked
You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 month, for edit warring and disruption at Ramdasia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gwen Gale (talk) 17:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I undid this edit because you posted within the block notice. I blocked you for edit warring and disruption and it's been a long time since the page has been protected (which as I recall was owing to your edit warring in the past). Gwen Gale (talk) 18:18, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I see that you meant to post an unblock request, I have done what I think you meant to do below. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Ravinder, do not post your unblock requests within the block notice. Rather, post wholly apart from the block notice. I have, for the second time, done this for you below. Gwen Gale (talk) 18:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Having spent some time reading through the long and depressing saga asoociated with your block, I do not feel that any change either to your block or to the Ramdasia page. But it seems to me that you have spent most of a year arguing about this page, to no real purpose and certainly with no meaningful effect. Could I suggest, in all seriousness, that when your block expires you live with the situation and turn your undoubted editing skills to a less controversial topic? --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 19:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

sockpuppetry
I have reset your block of one month because it is overwhelmingly likely that you have tried to evade this block by editing as User:Sunnyissunny. If you are found socking again, your next block will be much longer than a month. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Would You like to Help?
Hi, I am starting WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the []. McKinseies (talk) 15:07, 15 February 2012 (UTC)