User talk:RawalJaisal

Welcome!
Hello, RawalJaisal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Battle of Singoli, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 20:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Battle of Singoli


The page Draft:Battle of Singoli has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from http://princeroyale.blogspot.com/2009/12/u-v-w-states.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 20:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anangpal Tomar, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Do not remove content. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dhyan Chand, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. utcursch &#124; talk 13:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anangpal Tomar, you may be blocked from editing. ''Do not POV push Rajput in the article. The term originated in the 16th century, much later than when the article subject was alive. Take your concerns to the talk page if necessary.'' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:40, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Alivardi  (talk)  11:12, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 20:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Standard notice
 Ravensfire  (talk) 21:13, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alivardi   (talk)  19:50, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

February 2021
Hello, I'm Vengeance 01. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions to Dhyan Chand because it did not appear constructive and was also unsourced. Please don't attack other editors, comment on content not on other editors. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk or you can also ask me at my talk page Thanks. Vengeance 01 (talk) 12:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chaulukya dynasty have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chaulukya dynasty was changed by RawalJaisal (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904156 on 2021-02-26T15:17:35+00:00

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alivardi   (talk)  16:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because this edit summary full of Hindi expletives makes it clear that you are not here to build an encyclopedia but to promote your caste. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. utcursch &#124; talk 16:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Noting in case of future appeals: RawalJaisal evaded their block as ; see also the relevant SPI. Best, Blablubbs&#124;talk 15:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)