User talk:Rawna Praveen singh solanki

Speedy deletion nomination of Major Thakur Dalpat Singh


A tag has been placed on Major Thakur Dalpat Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. EnormityOP (talk) 03:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dewal Pratiharas. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you.  Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 10:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The content refference and source are deleted from this page by User:Fancy vibēs. He destroy the reliable refference like  which states the Dewal Pratihara are Rajput.  Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 07:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 22:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Unblock
Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 12:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, you'll need to remove the "nowiki" tags around the unblock request template to place it correctly. Regards, — AP 499D25  (talk)  00:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your suggestion and and attention. Thank you♥️ Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 01:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Unblock
(talk) 14:47, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * You may not remove declined block notices while you are still blocked. You have used nowiki tags to break your appeal once again. Cabayi (talk) 16:15, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for suggestion but I remove declined block notice and other things because I wan unable to edit my Unblock 2 to remove nowiki tags but whatever Thanks for your attention. Thank you Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 16:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Just a heads up, you'll need to edit the page in source code mode, rather than in the VisualEditor mode to be able to place templates correctly without parts of it becoming "nowikied". Also, don't place templates (or double curly brackets in general) in section headings (the equal sign things surrounding a piece of text). Putting two curly brackets around a page name transcludes (i.e. places a mirror copy of) that page's contents onto this page. Regards, — AP 499D25  (talk)  23:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very for your Information and Wish you Happy Diwali.Thank you♥️ Rawna Praveen singh solanki (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2023 (UTC)